Insider research: Reflexivity, responsibility, and community-informed approaches

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Jimmy Aguilar, Gabriela M. Torres, Andrea J. Macias
{"title":"Insider research: Reflexivity, responsibility, and community-informed approaches","authors":"Jimmy Aguilar,&nbsp;Gabriela M. Torres,&nbsp;Andrea J. Macias","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite advancements in educational psychology research that have amplified the diverse experiences and development of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in educational spaces, BIPOC scholars continue to face challenges in the change-resistant landscape of academia and educational psychology. One prominent issue is the lack of methodological frameworks that consider the lived realities of BIPOC participants and the positionality of BIPOC researchers. As Latina/o researchers, we collaboratewith our communities to reconstruct existing paradigms and deconstruct deficit perspectives. We provide alternatives in educational psychology, addressing the issue of race-neutral solutions that often default to white middle-class students as the norm. We contend that researcher reflexivity and responsibility to one’s community allow participants and researchers to present their whole selves beyond existing protocols, norms of engagement, and temporal research participant expectations. Our ongoing qualitative research study examines how Latina community college transfer students at selective universities in California interact with support networks and develop a sense of community. Our team adopts a reflexive and relational methodology for engaging in insider research. While this focuses on the experiences of Latina college students, our framework aims to motivate BIPOC researchers conceptualize culturally relevant methodologies, recognizing that we do not aim to offer a one-size-fits-all approach. This methodology centers researcher(s) positionality and researcher-participant connections, allowing us to better calibrate participant responses and capture lived experiences beyond the confines of existing theories and frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advancements in educational psychology research that have amplified the diverse experiences and development of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in educational spaces, BIPOC scholars continue to face challenges in the change-resistant landscape of academia and educational psychology. One prominent issue is the lack of methodological frameworks that consider the lived realities of BIPOC participants and the positionality of BIPOC researchers. As Latina/o researchers, we collaboratewith our communities to reconstruct existing paradigms and deconstruct deficit perspectives. We provide alternatives in educational psychology, addressing the issue of race-neutral solutions that often default to white middle-class students as the norm. We contend that researcher reflexivity and responsibility to one’s community allow participants and researchers to present their whole selves beyond existing protocols, norms of engagement, and temporal research participant expectations. Our ongoing qualitative research study examines how Latina community college transfer students at selective universities in California interact with support networks and develop a sense of community. Our team adopts a reflexive and relational methodology for engaging in insider research. While this focuses on the experiences of Latina college students, our framework aims to motivate BIPOC researchers conceptualize culturally relevant methodologies, recognizing that we do not aim to offer a one-size-fits-all approach. This methodology centers researcher(s) positionality and researcher-participant connections, allowing us to better calibrate participant responses and capture lived experiences beyond the confines of existing theories and frameworks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信