M. Veeger , E.M. Veenendaal , J. Limpens , M. Ottelé , H.M. Jonkers
{"title":"Moss species for bioreceptive concrete: A survey of epilithic urban moss communities and their dynamics","authors":"M. Veeger , E.M. Veenendaal , J. Limpens , M. Ottelé , H.M. Jonkers","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research into bioreceptive materials is gaining increased interest. However, while advances are being made on the material side of bioreceptivity, the underlying ecology of urban mosses is still underexposed. This research aimed to determine how the local environment affects the species composition of urban epilithic moss communities and assess which moss species are most suitable for the colonisation of pristine (bioreceptive) concrete surfaces, leading to recommendations for moss species selection to designers and engineers of bioreceptive structures. We conducted a field survey of 137 moss communities on concrete in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. A total of 26 different species were found, of which the acrocarp species <em>Tortula muralis, Grimmia pulvinata, Ptychostomum capillare</em>, and <em>Orthotrichum diaphanum</em> and the pleurocarp species <em>Brachythecium rutabulum, Hypnum cupressiforme,</em> and <em>Rhynchostegium confertum</em> acted as most common pioneers and also formed a part of the climax community. We found some positive associations between acrocarp species but negative associations between acrocarp and pleurocarp species. Local environmental factors only played a small role in the community composition at a species level; however, when comparing acrocarp and pleurocarp species, the former preferred more exposed sites, whereas the latter preferred more shaded habitats. As such, we recommend that bioreceptive concrete structures use acrocarp pioneers for exposed locations and pleurocarp pioneers for more shaded locations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research into bioreceptive materials is gaining increased interest. However, while advances are being made on the material side of bioreceptivity, the underlying ecology of urban mosses is still underexposed. This research aimed to determine how the local environment affects the species composition of urban epilithic moss communities and assess which moss species are most suitable for the colonisation of pristine (bioreceptive) concrete surfaces, leading to recommendations for moss species selection to designers and engineers of bioreceptive structures. We conducted a field survey of 137 moss communities on concrete in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. A total of 26 different species were found, of which the acrocarp species Tortula muralis, Grimmia pulvinata, Ptychostomum capillare, and Orthotrichum diaphanum and the pleurocarp species Brachythecium rutabulum, Hypnum cupressiforme, and Rhynchostegium confertum acted as most common pioneers and also formed a part of the climax community. We found some positive associations between acrocarp species but negative associations between acrocarp and pleurocarp species. Local environmental factors only played a small role in the community composition at a species level; however, when comparing acrocarp and pleurocarp species, the former preferred more exposed sites, whereas the latter preferred more shaded habitats. As such, we recommend that bioreceptive concrete structures use acrocarp pioneers for exposed locations and pleurocarp pioneers for more shaded locations.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.