The impact of restoration of Lithuanian peatlands on the economic value of certain ecosystem services

IF 3.9 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107475

Gintarė Sujetovienė, Giedrius Dabašinskas

{"title":"The impact of restoration of Lithuanian peatlands on the economic value of certain ecosystem services","authors":"Gintarė Sujetovienė, Giedrius Dabašinskas","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of the study is to assess spatial and temporal changes in the economic values of ecosystem services provided by Lithuanian peatlands and to assess the benefits of restoring drained peatlands in comparison to the costs. Lithuania has lost about 75 % of its peatlands, most of which are drained fens (74 %), and most of which remain intact were raised peatlands (65 %). Forestry and agriculture were the main drivers of peatland loss. The examined ecosystem services provided by undrained peatlands, compared to drained ones, were mainly related to climate and water flow regulation, waste management, biodiversity, and recreation. Based on this selection of ecosystem services (ES), the value of intact peat ecosystem services is $1336 million per year. Undrained peatlands, occupying less than half the area of drained peatlands, provide twice as many benefits in terms of ES as drained ecosystems. If these drained peatlands were restored by 2050, they would account for $4006 million per year. A cost-benefit analysis has shown that the benefits outweigh the costs, making restoration efforts economically justifiable. More effective management measures could achieve a balance between the use of these ecosystems and the benefits they provide to human well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess spatial and temporal changes in the economic values of ecosystem services provided by Lithuanian peatlands and to assess the benefits of restoring drained peatlands in comparison to the costs. Lithuania has lost about 75 % of its peatlands, most of which are drained fens (74 %), and most of which remain intact were raised peatlands (65 %). Forestry and agriculture were the main drivers of peatland loss. The examined ecosystem services provided by undrained peatlands, compared to drained ones, were mainly related to climate and water flow regulation, waste management, biodiversity, and recreation. Based on this selection of ecosystem services (ES), the value of intact peat ecosystem services is $1336 million per year. Undrained peatlands, occupying less than half the area of drained peatlands, provide twice as many benefits in terms of ES as drained ecosystems. If these drained peatlands were restored by 2050, they would account for $4006 million per year. A cost-benefit analysis has shown that the benefits outweigh the costs, making restoration efforts economically justifiable. More effective management measures could achieve a balance between the use of these ecosystems and the benefits they provide to human well-being.

查看原文本刊更多论文

立陶宛泥炭地恢复对某些生态系统服务的经济价值的影响

这项研究的目的是评估立陶宛泥炭地提供的生态系统服务的经济价值的时空变化，并评估恢复排水泥炭地的收益与成本的比较。立陶宛已经失去了大约75%的泥炭地，其中大部分是排水的沼泽（74%），大部分保存完好的泥炭地（65%）。林业和农业是泥炭地流失的主要驱动因素。与排水泥炭地相比，不排水泥炭地提供的生态系统服务主要与气候和水流调节、废物管理、生物多样性和娱乐有关。基于这种生态系统服务选择（ES），完整泥炭生态系统服务的价值为每年1.36亿美元。未排水泥炭地占排水泥炭地面积的不到一半，但就生态系统而言，它提供的效益是排水生态系统的两倍。如果这些排干的泥炭地在2050年前恢复，每年将带来4.06亿美元的收入。一项成本效益分析表明，收益大于成本，从经济上讲，恢复工作是合理的。更有效的管理措施可以在这些生态系统的利用及其对人类福祉的益处之间取得平衡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程：环境

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

293

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.