Vegetative nature-based solutions for coastal flood risk management: Benefits, challenges, and uncertainties

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine, Avidesh Seenath
{"title":"Vegetative nature-based solutions for coastal flood risk management: Benefits, challenges, and uncertainties","authors":"Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine,&nbsp;Avidesh Seenath","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal regions, home to more than one-third of the world's population, face increasing flood risks due to sea-level rise and intensifying storms under climate change. Traditional ‘grey’ solutions, such as seawalls and groynes, while effective at a local scale and over the short-term, are costly, disrupt natural ecosystems, and have adverse ripple effects for downdrift coastal areas. Vegetative forms of Nature-Based Coastal Solutions (NBCS), which include the use of mangroves, saltmarshes, and seagrasses, offer a sustainable alternative, with wider environmental benefits apart from just coastal flood risk reduction. In this review, we examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS in mitigating coastal flood risk and consider the limitations, challenges and uncertainties around their implementation. We find that mangroves, saltmarshes, and seagrasses significantly reduce wave energy, attenuate storm surges, and stabilise sediments, with evidence showing up to a 72% reduction in wave energy by saltmarshes and a 66% reduction in wave height by mangroves. Also, we find that these ecosystems have the potential to contribute to long-term coastal resilience through carbon sequestration, biodiversity enhancement, and shoreline stabilisation. However, the effectiveness of these solutions can vary based on vegetation density, species type, and environmental conditions, pointing towards the need for targeted management efforts. Additionally, there are several ecological, environmental, socioeconomic, policy and geomorphology challenges associated with implementing vegetative NBCS. We discuss these as well as identify critical knowledge gaps on NBCS understandings for coastal flood risk management and outline new research pathways to address these gaps. Our review, therefore, has important implications for refining coastal flood risk management (both understandings and approach), communication strategies, and policies towards enabling more robust decision-making for sustainable coastal flood risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 107520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124005052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal regions, home to more than one-third of the world's population, face increasing flood risks due to sea-level rise and intensifying storms under climate change. Traditional ‘grey’ solutions, such as seawalls and groynes, while effective at a local scale and over the short-term, are costly, disrupt natural ecosystems, and have adverse ripple effects for downdrift coastal areas. Vegetative forms of Nature-Based Coastal Solutions (NBCS), which include the use of mangroves, saltmarshes, and seagrasses, offer a sustainable alternative, with wider environmental benefits apart from just coastal flood risk reduction. In this review, we examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS in mitigating coastal flood risk and consider the limitations, challenges and uncertainties around their implementation. We find that mangroves, saltmarshes, and seagrasses significantly reduce wave energy, attenuate storm surges, and stabilise sediments, with evidence showing up to a 72% reduction in wave energy by saltmarshes and a 66% reduction in wave height by mangroves. Also, we find that these ecosystems have the potential to contribute to long-term coastal resilience through carbon sequestration, biodiversity enhancement, and shoreline stabilisation. However, the effectiveness of these solutions can vary based on vegetation density, species type, and environmental conditions, pointing towards the need for targeted management efforts. Additionally, there are several ecological, environmental, socioeconomic, policy and geomorphology challenges associated with implementing vegetative NBCS. We discuss these as well as identify critical knowledge gaps on NBCS understandings for coastal flood risk management and outline new research pathways to address these gaps. Our review, therefore, has important implications for refining coastal flood risk management (both understandings and approach), communication strategies, and policies towards enabling more robust decision-making for sustainable coastal flood risk management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信