Parveen Kumar , Geetam Tiwari , Sourabh Bikas Paul
{"title":"Road safety studies at micro, meso, and macroscopic levels: A systematic review","authors":"Parveen Kumar , Geetam Tiwari , Sourabh Bikas Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.iatssr.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditionally, road safety studies have been conducted independently, either at microscopic or macroscopic levels. This study synthesizes existing literature on road safety research conducted at microscopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic levels using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The objective of this research is to examine the advancement in crash prediction methodologies, crash analysis, and the integration of microscopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic studies over the past two decades to understand the multiscale dynamics of crash occurrence. In addition, bibliometric analysis helps to map social, conceptual, and intellectual collaborations among sources, authors, and institutions. The comprehensive review of the existing literature shows that some analytical advancements in statistical approaches, as well as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches, have facilitated them to address data complexity issues. In the latter decade, researchers have started to integrate microscopic and macroscopic approaches to have a nuanced and cohesive understanding of the intrinsic relationships among crash contributing factors and to assess the impact of an integrated approach on the model's predictive performance. The bibliometric analysis of published literature revealed distinct clusters, each providing a unique perspective on road safety. The major gaps observed in the systematic review of studies are the lack of consideration of behavioural aspects of road users, the transferability of models between two independent frameworks, as well as across the integrated modelling methodologies. Another significant gap is the lack of a scale of adjacent street networks in mesoscopic studies. Overall, this review provided critical insights into safety studies that focus on distinct resolutions, analytical advancements in modelling methodologies, mapping of scientific collaborations and identifications of research gaps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47059,"journal":{"name":"IATSS Research","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 10-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IATSS Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111224000578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditionally, road safety studies have been conducted independently, either at microscopic or macroscopic levels. This study synthesizes existing literature on road safety research conducted at microscopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic levels using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The objective of this research is to examine the advancement in crash prediction methodologies, crash analysis, and the integration of microscopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic studies over the past two decades to understand the multiscale dynamics of crash occurrence. In addition, bibliometric analysis helps to map social, conceptual, and intellectual collaborations among sources, authors, and institutions. The comprehensive review of the existing literature shows that some analytical advancements in statistical approaches, as well as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches, have facilitated them to address data complexity issues. In the latter decade, researchers have started to integrate microscopic and macroscopic approaches to have a nuanced and cohesive understanding of the intrinsic relationships among crash contributing factors and to assess the impact of an integrated approach on the model's predictive performance. The bibliometric analysis of published literature revealed distinct clusters, each providing a unique perspective on road safety. The major gaps observed in the systematic review of studies are the lack of consideration of behavioural aspects of road users, the transferability of models between two independent frameworks, as well as across the integrated modelling methodologies. Another significant gap is the lack of a scale of adjacent street networks in mesoscopic studies. Overall, this review provided critical insights into safety studies that focus on distinct resolutions, analytical advancements in modelling methodologies, mapping of scientific collaborations and identifications of research gaps.
期刊介绍:
First published in 1977 as an international journal sponsored by the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, IATSS Research has contributed to the dissemination of interdisciplinary wisdom on ideal mobility, particularly in Asia. IATSS Research is an international refereed journal providing a platform for the exchange of scientific findings on transportation and safety across a wide range of academic fields, with particular emphasis on the links between scientific findings and practice in society and cultural contexts. IATSS Research welcomes submission of original research articles and reviews that satisfy the following conditions: 1.Relevant to transportation and safety, and the multiple impacts of transportation systems on security, human health, and the environment. 2.Contains important policy and practical implications based on scientific evidence in the applicable academic field. In addition to welcoming general submissions, IATSS Research occasionally plans and publishes special feature sections and special issues composed of invited articles addressing specific topics.