Modelling the impact of shelf-life extension on fresh produce waste in UK homes

Rachel Devine , Sarah Key , Ellie Trotman , Cansu Kandemir , Tom Quested , Christian Reynolds , SC Lenny Koh , Penny Huckle
{"title":"Modelling the impact of shelf-life extension on fresh produce waste in UK homes","authors":"Rachel Devine ,&nbsp;Sarah Key ,&nbsp;Ellie Trotman ,&nbsp;Cansu Kandemir ,&nbsp;Tom Quested ,&nbsp;Christian Reynolds ,&nbsp;SC Lenny Koh ,&nbsp;Penny Huckle","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research uses the Household Simulation Model (HHSM), to assess shelf-life extension mechanisms for reducing fresh produce waste in UK homes. Removal of Best Before dates is the most effective mechanism, reducing waste by 8–28 percentage points depending on the product (e.g., for bananas, a modelled waste reduction from 24 % of purchases to 16 %, an 8 percentage-point reduction). The findings support current recommendations to remove Best Before dates on uncut fresh produce. Refrigerating apples at 4°C extends product shelf life from 31 to 108 days resulting in a modelled reduction of 2.5 percentage points from 3.1 % to 0.61 %. Storage at optimal fridge temperature (4°C compared to 9°C) shows a modelled waste reduction for cucumbers of 16 percentage points from 43 % to 27 %. However, both refrigeration mechanisms assume a major change in consumer behaviour which could be challenging to overcome. Edible bio-based coatings show a modelled reduction for oranges, satsumas, and avocados ranging from 3 to 12 percentage points, offering a high-reward, low-effort solution for reducing Household Food Waste (HHFW) with relatively low implementation costs. Plastic packaging removal varies by product with a 9-percentage point reduction for bananas, but no effect on apples and cucumber. Consumer behaviour and proportion of products sold packaged will substantially affect waste reductions. The broader impact of plastic packaging on food management practices is not fully considered in this study, so results should not inform policy decision-making. Whilst the findings are UK-specific, they offer insights for other countries, though country-specific data is recommended for policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research uses the Household Simulation Model (HHSM), to assess shelf-life extension mechanisms for reducing fresh produce waste in UK homes. Removal of Best Before dates is the most effective mechanism, reducing waste by 8–28 percentage points depending on the product (e.g., for bananas, a modelled waste reduction from 24 % of purchases to 16 %, an 8 percentage-point reduction). The findings support current recommendations to remove Best Before dates on uncut fresh produce. Refrigerating apples at 4°C extends product shelf life from 31 to 108 days resulting in a modelled reduction of 2.5 percentage points from 3.1 % to 0.61 %. Storage at optimal fridge temperature (4°C compared to 9°C) shows a modelled waste reduction for cucumbers of 16 percentage points from 43 % to 27 %. However, both refrigeration mechanisms assume a major change in consumer behaviour which could be challenging to overcome. Edible bio-based coatings show a modelled reduction for oranges, satsumas, and avocados ranging from 3 to 12 percentage points, offering a high-reward, low-effort solution for reducing Household Food Waste (HHFW) with relatively low implementation costs. Plastic packaging removal varies by product with a 9-percentage point reduction for bananas, but no effect on apples and cucumber. Consumer behaviour and proportion of products sold packaged will substantially affect waste reductions. The broader impact of plastic packaging on food management practices is not fully considered in this study, so results should not inform policy decision-making. Whilst the findings are UK-specific, they offer insights for other countries, though country-specific data is recommended for policy decisions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信