Validation study of cross-ventilation in a realistic building geometry: RANS, SAS and LES

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mutmainnah Sudirman , Twan van Hooff , Stefanie Gillmeier , Bert Blocken
{"title":"Validation study of cross-ventilation in a realistic building geometry: RANS, SAS and LES","authors":"Mutmainnah Sudirman ,&nbsp;Twan van Hooff ,&nbsp;Stefanie Gillmeier ,&nbsp;Bert Blocken","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of natural cross-ventilation flow with wind tunnel (WT) measurements is important in view of accurate and reliable numerical simulations. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of previous CFD and WT measurement studies employed a simplified generic single-zone building with a prismatic shape. The objective of this study is the validation of isothermal CFD simulations of two different realistic building models resembling a pitched roof single-story house, both without (case 1) and with internal partition (case 2). The CFD simulations were conducted using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach with the SST k-ω, RLZ k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models, scale-adaptive simulations (SAS) with the SST k-ω model, and large eddy simulations (LES) with the Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid-scale model. The evaluation was performed in two parts: impact of turbulence model and impact of internal partition. The results show that LES and SAS exhibit a good agreement with WT results, outperforming RANS for the two cases. When considering only indoor streamwise mean velocity, for case 1, 97 % and 73 % of the sampled LES and SAS velocities fall with the uncertainty band of the WT measurements. For case 2, these values are 92 % and 75 % for LES and SAS, respectively. Steady RANS provides an agreement of only 56 % and 63 % for case 1 and case 2, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 112354"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013232401196X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of natural cross-ventilation flow with wind tunnel (WT) measurements is important in view of accurate and reliable numerical simulations. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of previous CFD and WT measurement studies employed a simplified generic single-zone building with a prismatic shape. The objective of this study is the validation of isothermal CFD simulations of two different realistic building models resembling a pitched roof single-story house, both without (case 1) and with internal partition (case 2). The CFD simulations were conducted using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach with the SST k-ω, RLZ k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models, scale-adaptive simulations (SAS) with the SST k-ω model, and large eddy simulations (LES) with the Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid-scale model. The evaluation was performed in two parts: impact of turbulence model and impact of internal partition. The results show that LES and SAS exhibit a good agreement with WT results, outperforming RANS for the two cases. When considering only indoor streamwise mean velocity, for case 1, 97 % and 73 % of the sampled LES and SAS velocities fall with the uncertainty band of the WT measurements. For case 2, these values are 92 % and 75 % for LES and SAS, respectively. Steady RANS provides an agreement of only 56 % and 63 % for case 1 and case 2, respectively.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信