Evoking ‘other countries’ in media discourses: The case of the Covid-19 pandemic in six countries

IF 2.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Lauri Heimo , Pertti Alasuutari , Laia Pi Ferrer , Olga Ulybina
{"title":"Evoking ‘other countries’ in media discourses: The case of the Covid-19 pandemic in six countries","authors":"Lauri Heimo ,&nbsp;Pertti Alasuutari ,&nbsp;Laia Pi Ferrer ,&nbsp;Olga Ulybina","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic did not only imply a spread of a virus, it also set in motion a series of global measures and discourses that likewise diffused worldwide. This article explores the global dissemination of knowledge and cross-national comparisons in the context of a global pandemic. We approach the question by analysing coverage of COVID-19 in newspapers published in Australia, Russia, Singapore, Tanzania, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The analysis reveals that the concept of the world uniting against a common enemy, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, was absent from media coverage. Instead, the prevalent discourse centered around competition between states. However, this article argues that this does not imply that the world is divided into distinct cultures with divergent views or understandings of reality. Rather, we argue that the pandemic led to the formation of a discursive field consisting of the reference points that constitute sensible and legitimate ways to discuss potential policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 100847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221169582400093X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic did not only imply a spread of a virus, it also set in motion a series of global measures and discourses that likewise diffused worldwide. This article explores the global dissemination of knowledge and cross-national comparisons in the context of a global pandemic. We approach the question by analysing coverage of COVID-19 in newspapers published in Australia, Russia, Singapore, Tanzania, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. The analysis reveals that the concept of the world uniting against a common enemy, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, was absent from media coverage. Instead, the prevalent discourse centered around competition between states. However, this article argues that this does not imply that the world is divided into distinct cultures with divergent views or understandings of reality. Rather, we argue that the pandemic led to the formation of a discursive field consisting of the reference points that constitute sensible and legitimate ways to discuss potential policies.
在媒体话语中唤起“其他国家”:六个国家的Covid-19大流行案例
2019冠状病毒病大流行不仅意味着病毒的传播,还引发了一系列全球措施和话语,这些措施和话语同样在世界范围内传播。本文探讨了在全球大流行背景下知识的全球传播和跨国比较。我们通过分析澳大利亚、俄罗斯、新加坡、坦桑尼亚、联合王国和美利坚合众国出版的报纸对COVID-19的报道来解决这个问题。分析显示,媒体报道中缺乏全球团结起来应对新冠肺炎疫情等共同敌人的概念。相反,流行的话语集中在国家之间的竞争上。然而,本文认为,这并不意味着世界被划分为不同的文化,对现实的看法或理解不同。相反,我们认为,大流行病导致形成了一个由参考点组成的话语领域,这些参考点构成了讨论潜在政策的合理和合法方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信