The effects of a supportive learning culture and rank on professional skepticism in information search

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Therese Grohnert , Wim H. Gijselaers , Roger H.G. Meuwissen , Ken T. Trotman
{"title":"The effects of a supportive learning culture and rank on professional skepticism in information search","authors":"Therese Grohnert ,&nbsp;Wim H. Gijselaers ,&nbsp;Roger H.G. Meuwissen ,&nbsp;Ken T. Trotman","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2025.101590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Auditors at all ranks should be skeptical when searching for information throughout audits. However, we lever domain learning theory from educational psychology to posit that their skepticism unlikely develops evenly across ranks, but rather depends on a supportive learning culture, a construct from the management literature. To test that perceived learning culture moderates the association between auditor rank and skeptical information search, we use a laboratory study with 166 Dutch auditors at a Big 4 firm and follow-up interviews with seven top leaders of that firm. A more supportive perceived learning culture is associated with more skeptical information search, but only in audit managers and partners - not in associates and seniors. Interviewees attribute this pattern to values acquired over time through socialization, role expectations, knowledge development, and wider task characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368225000029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Auditors at all ranks should be skeptical when searching for information throughout audits. However, we lever domain learning theory from educational psychology to posit that their skepticism unlikely develops evenly across ranks, but rather depends on a supportive learning culture, a construct from the management literature. To test that perceived learning culture moderates the association between auditor rank and skeptical information search, we use a laboratory study with 166 Dutch auditors at a Big 4 firm and follow-up interviews with seven top leaders of that firm. A more supportive perceived learning culture is associated with more skeptical information search, but only in audit managers and partners - not in associates and seniors. Interviewees attribute this pattern to values acquired over time through socialization, role expectations, knowledge development, and wider task characteristics.
支持性学习文化和等级对信息搜索专业怀疑态度的影响
在整个审计过程中寻找信息时,各级审计员都应该持怀疑态度。然而,我们利用教育心理学的领域学习理论,假设他们的怀疑主义不可能在各个阶层中均匀发展,而是取决于一种支持性的学习文化,这是一种来自管理文献的构建。为了检验感知学习文化是否调节了审计师级别与怀疑信息搜索之间的关系,我们对一家四大会计师事务所的166名荷兰审计师进行了实验室研究,并对该公司的7位高层领导人进行了后续访谈。一个更支持性的感知学习文化与更怀疑的信息搜索相关,但只在审计经理和合伙人中,而不是在助理和高级职员中。受访者将这种模式归因于随着时间的推移通过社会化、角色期望、知识发展和更广泛的任务特征获得的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信