Validation of the Hungarian Version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU)–A Multi-Source Data Collection Approach

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Zsófia Boytha , Ákos Münnich , Alexandra Szilágyiné Sándor , Gabriella Tullner , Zsuzsanna Bélteczki , E. Csaba Móré , Krisztina Czere , Tamás Kánya , Márton Lukács , Judit Molnár
{"title":"Validation of the Hungarian Version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU)–A Multi-Source Data Collection Approach","authors":"Zsófia Boytha ,&nbsp;Ákos Münnich ,&nbsp;Alexandra Szilágyiné Sándor ,&nbsp;Gabriella Tullner ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Bélteczki ,&nbsp;E. Csaba Móré ,&nbsp;Krisztina Czere ,&nbsp;Tamás Kánya ,&nbsp;Márton Lukács ,&nbsp;Judit Molnár","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes the development of the Hungarian version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU). The MID is a 218-item, self-administered, multi-scale instrument that comprehensively assesses the phenomenological domain of pathological dissociation and is suitable for diagnosing dissociative disorders. We used a multi-source approach to reach participants. We collected data from the psychiatric and addiction wards of two hospitals, private practices, and from online sources. Finally, the results of 323 participants were analyzed. We used the participants’ DES and MID-HU results to classify them into five groups: (1) Healthy control group, (2) Dissociative disorder group, (3) Dissociative symptoms group, (4) Psychiatric inpatients group without dissociation and substance use disorder (SUD) and (5) Alcohol dependent inpatients without dissociation. For testing discriminant validity we used several sections of SR-DDIS.</div><div>The MID-HU had strong internal consistency, temporal stability and strong structural, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the MID-HU extracted a single factor: dissociation. Our results are similar to other international findings. We also found that the mean MID-HU correlated strongly with two SR-DDIS subscales: ’Features associated with DID’ (r: 0.79) and the ’Schneiderian first-rank symptoms’ (r: 0.62), while only at a moderate level with the other subscales (r: 0.40). The two dissociative groups proved to be significantly more traumatized than the other groups, although we found childhood traumatization in the psychiatric and AD inpatient groups as well, which affected the construct validity results. The DD group proved to be most severely traumatized among the five groups of participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Hungarian version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID-HU). The MID is a 218-item, self-administered, multi-scale instrument that comprehensively assesses the phenomenological domain of pathological dissociation and is suitable for diagnosing dissociative disorders. We used a multi-source approach to reach participants. We collected data from the psychiatric and addiction wards of two hospitals, private practices, and from online sources. Finally, the results of 323 participants were analyzed. We used the participants’ DES and MID-HU results to classify them into five groups: (1) Healthy control group, (2) Dissociative disorder group, (3) Dissociative symptoms group, (4) Psychiatric inpatients group without dissociation and substance use disorder (SUD) and (5) Alcohol dependent inpatients without dissociation. For testing discriminant validity we used several sections of SR-DDIS.
The MID-HU had strong internal consistency, temporal stability and strong structural, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the MID-HU extracted a single factor: dissociation. Our results are similar to other international findings. We also found that the mean MID-HU correlated strongly with two SR-DDIS subscales: ’Features associated with DID’ (r: 0.79) and the ’Schneiderian first-rank symptoms’ (r: 0.62), while only at a moderate level with the other subscales (r: 0.40). The two dissociative groups proved to be significantly more traumatized than the other groups, although we found childhood traumatization in the psychiatric and AD inpatient groups as well, which affected the construct validity results. The DD group proved to be most severely traumatized among the five groups of participants.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信