Scaling up interpersonal psychotherapy training: A pilot randomized controlled trial of digital asynchronous self-directed vs. synchronous group workshop training

Q3 Psychology
Paula Ravitz , Natalie Heeney , Andrea Lawson , Edward McAnanama , Clare Pain , Alex Kiss , Priya Watson , Jan Malat , Sophie Grigoriadis , Simone Vigod , Daisy R. Singla
{"title":"Scaling up interpersonal psychotherapy training: A pilot randomized controlled trial of digital asynchronous self-directed vs. synchronous group workshop training","authors":"Paula Ravitz ,&nbsp;Natalie Heeney ,&nbsp;Andrea Lawson ,&nbsp;Edward McAnanama ,&nbsp;Clare Pain ,&nbsp;Alex Kiss ,&nbsp;Priya Watson ,&nbsp;Jan Malat ,&nbsp;Sophie Grigoriadis ,&nbsp;Simone Vigod ,&nbsp;Daisy R. Singla","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) is an effective depression treatment but limited numbers of trained providers result in less access than patients need. Asynchronous self-directed digital training may reduce this gap.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed digital IPT training and evaluated it in a pilot parallel randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry residents (N=25) in Toronto, Canada, were randomly assigned, 1:1, to an asynchronous self-directed digital course (intervention; n=13) or synchronous group training-as-usual workshop (control; n=12) and then delivered ∼12 clinically-supervised individual IPT sessions to depressed patients (N=26; 10≥PHQ9&lt;20). The primary objective was to examine intervention feasibility and acceptability (retention, facilitators, barriers). We also examined resident competence (IPT knowledge, confidence, clinical skills, therapeutic alliances) and patient depressive outcomes (PHQ9).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Resident retention in intervention (10/13; 76.9%) vs control (11/12; 91.7%) groups did not differ (<em>p</em>=.59). Qualitative semi-structured interviews with intervention residents (n=10) revealed that IPT's relational focus, video-recorded expert demonstrations (9/10; 90%), and case-based digital curriculum's user-friendliness (7/10; 70%) were facilitators. Half missed peer interactions in group workshops and found some interactive course elements disrupted learning. Both groups’ competence improved over time (F≥25.7, <em>p</em>≤.0001), with no significant between-arm differences in knowledge, confidence, skills, or therapeutic alliances (F≤1.07, <em>p</em>≥.31). Intervention and control patient groups improved from baseline (PHQ9=14.6 vs. 13.2; F=24.4, p=.0001), with no significant between-arm post-treatment depressive symptom differences (PHQ9=7.63 vs. 7.60, <em>t</em>=-0.01<em>, p</em>=.99).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Small sample and provider type (psychiatry resident) limit generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Digital asynchronous self-directed IPT training is feasible and acceptable, with preliminary evidence of efficacy for trainee competence and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100863"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) is an effective depression treatment but limited numbers of trained providers result in less access than patients need. Asynchronous self-directed digital training may reduce this gap.

Methods

We developed digital IPT training and evaluated it in a pilot parallel randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry residents (N=25) in Toronto, Canada, were randomly assigned, 1:1, to an asynchronous self-directed digital course (intervention; n=13) or synchronous group training-as-usual workshop (control; n=12) and then delivered ∼12 clinically-supervised individual IPT sessions to depressed patients (N=26; 10≥PHQ9<20). The primary objective was to examine intervention feasibility and acceptability (retention, facilitators, barriers). We also examined resident competence (IPT knowledge, confidence, clinical skills, therapeutic alliances) and patient depressive outcomes (PHQ9).

Results

Resident retention in intervention (10/13; 76.9%) vs control (11/12; 91.7%) groups did not differ (p=.59). Qualitative semi-structured interviews with intervention residents (n=10) revealed that IPT's relational focus, video-recorded expert demonstrations (9/10; 90%), and case-based digital curriculum's user-friendliness (7/10; 70%) were facilitators. Half missed peer interactions in group workshops and found some interactive course elements disrupted learning. Both groups’ competence improved over time (F≥25.7, p≤.0001), with no significant between-arm differences in knowledge, confidence, skills, or therapeutic alliances (F≤1.07, p≥.31). Intervention and control patient groups improved from baseline (PHQ9=14.6 vs. 13.2; F=24.4, p=.0001), with no significant between-arm post-treatment depressive symptom differences (PHQ9=7.63 vs. 7.60, t=-0.01, p=.99).

Limitations

Small sample and provider type (psychiatry resident) limit generalizability.

Conclusion

Digital asynchronous self-directed IPT training is feasible and acceptable, with preliminary evidence of efficacy for trainee competence and patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

扩大人际心理治疗训练:数字异步自我指导与同步小组工作坊训练的随机对照试验
人际心理治疗(IPT)是一种有效的抑郁症治疗方法,但训练有素的提供者数量有限,导致患者无法获得所需的治疗。异步自主数字培训可能会缩小这一差距。方法我们开发了数字化IPT培训,并在一项平行随机对照试验中对其进行评估。加拿大多伦多的精神科住院医师(N=25)被随机按1:1的比例分配到一个异步自我指导的数字课程(干预;N =13)或同步小组培训-照常车间(对照;n=12),然后对抑郁症患者进行~ 12次临床监督的个体IPT治疗(n= 26;10≥PHQ9< 20)。主要目标是检查干预的可行性和可接受性(保留、促进因素、障碍)。我们还检查了住院医师的能力(IPT知识、信心、临床技能、治疗联盟)和患者抑郁结果(PHQ9)。结果干预住院患者保留率(10/13;76.9%) vs对照组(11/12;91.7%)组间差异无统计学意义(p= 0.59)。对干预居民的定性半结构化访谈(n=10)显示,IPT的关系焦点,视频录制的专家演示(9/10;案例型数字课程的用户友好性(7/10;70%)是辅导员。一半的人错过了小组研讨会上的同伴互动,发现一些互动课程元素扰乱了学习。两组患者的能力均随时间推移而提高(F≥25.7,p≤0.0001),在知识、信心、技能或治疗联盟方面无显著组间差异(F≤1.07,p≥0.31)。干预组和对照组较基线改善(PHQ9=14.6 vs. 13.2;F=24.4, p= 0.0001),两组治疗后抑郁症状无显著差异(PHQ9=7.63 vs. 7.60, t=-0.01, p= 0.99)。局限性小样本和提供者类型(精神科住院医师)限制了通用性。结论数字化异步自主IPT培训是可行和可接受的,在学员能力和患者预后方面具有初步效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信