Intrinsic factors affecting predator failure in crab-gastropod encounters and their implications for repair scar frequencies

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Steven E. Mendonca , Carrie L. Tyler , Kristina M. Barclay , Lindsey R. Leighton
{"title":"Intrinsic factors affecting predator failure in crab-gastropod encounters and their implications for repair scar frequencies","authors":"Steven E. Mendonca ,&nbsp;Carrie L. Tyler ,&nbsp;Kristina M. Barclay ,&nbsp;Lindsey R. Leighton","doi":"10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repair scars result from sublethal predator damage which is regrown, permanently recording predator-prey encounters. Although interactions between crabs and gastropods are well studied, it is not clear under what conditions these encounters lead to the generation of repair scars. As failed attacks generate repair scars, here, we use arena experiments to investigate intrinsic factors affecting the likelihood of predator failure using the crab, <em>Cancer productus</em>, and two of its common gastropod prey, <em>Nucella ostrina</em> and <em>Tegula funebralis</em>. Regression models indicate that <em>C. productus</em> was 44 % more likely to fail in encounters with <em>T. funebralis</em> than those with <em>N. ostrina,</em> which may be due to differences in shell strength and shape. In addition, encounters with <em>T. funebralis</em> were much longer in duration than those with <em>N. ostrina,</em> particularly for large prey attacked by small predators. Predator size had a direct effect on attack outcomes, particularly for <em>T. funebralis</em>, and the long duration of encounters suggests that in natural settings, extrinsic factors could potentially have large effects on failure rates. Field data show that <em>T. funebralis</em> populations tend to have greater repair frequencies than do coexisting <em>N. ostrina.</em> We propose that differences in repair frequency between <em>T. funebralis</em> and <em>N. ostrina</em> at the same location are likely due to intrinsic factors. However, repair scar frequencies may also reflect the density of small predators, as repair scars may primarily result from small crabs, which are also more likely to be interrupted by extrinsic factors in natural settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","volume":"582 ","pages":"Article 152069"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Repair scars result from sublethal predator damage which is regrown, permanently recording predator-prey encounters. Although interactions between crabs and gastropods are well studied, it is not clear under what conditions these encounters lead to the generation of repair scars. As failed attacks generate repair scars, here, we use arena experiments to investigate intrinsic factors affecting the likelihood of predator failure using the crab, Cancer productus, and two of its common gastropod prey, Nucella ostrina and Tegula funebralis. Regression models indicate that C. productus was 44 % more likely to fail in encounters with T. funebralis than those with N. ostrina, which may be due to differences in shell strength and shape. In addition, encounters with T. funebralis were much longer in duration than those with N. ostrina, particularly for large prey attacked by small predators. Predator size had a direct effect on attack outcomes, particularly for T. funebralis, and the long duration of encounters suggests that in natural settings, extrinsic factors could potentially have large effects on failure rates. Field data show that T. funebralis populations tend to have greater repair frequencies than do coexisting N. ostrina. We propose that differences in repair frequency between T. funebralis and N. ostrina at the same location are likely due to intrinsic factors. However, repair scar frequencies may also reflect the density of small predators, as repair scars may primarily result from small crabs, which are also more likely to be interrupted by extrinsic factors in natural settings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology provides a forum for experimental ecological research on marine organisms in relation to their environment. Topic areas include studies that focus on biochemistry, physiology, behavior, genetics, and ecological theory. The main emphasis of the Journal lies in hypothesis driven experimental work, both from the laboratory and the field. Natural experiments or descriptive studies that elucidate fundamental ecological processes are welcome. Submissions should have a broad ecological framework beyond the specific study organism or geographic region. Short communications that highlight emerging issues and exciting discoveries within five printed pages will receive a rapid turnaround. Papers describing important new analytical, computational, experimental and theoretical techniques and methods are encouraged and will be highlighted as Methodological Advances. We welcome proposals for Review Papers synthesizing a specific field within marine ecology. Finally, the journal aims to publish Special Issues at regular intervals synthesizing a particular field of marine science. All printed papers undergo a peer review process before being accepted and will receive a first decision within three months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信