Access or exclusion to land: An overview of evolving trends in cocoa landscapes in Ghana

IF 2.2 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Doreen Asumang-Yeboah, Joana Akua Serwa Ameyaw, Emmanuel Acheampong, Winston Adams Asante
{"title":"Access or exclusion to land: An overview of evolving trends in cocoa landscapes in Ghana","authors":"Doreen Asumang-Yeboah,&nbsp;Joana Akua Serwa Ameyaw,&nbsp;Emmanuel Acheampong,&nbsp;Winston Adams Asante","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper employs historical trends and perspectives of key cocoa sector actors to understand the evolving patterns of land access within Ghana’s cocoa landscapes. Primary data was collected through focus group discussions, questionnaires administered to cocoa farmers, and key informant interviews with farmers, cocoa extension agents and landowners on how access to land is evolving, and the responses of these actors to the dynamics around land access. We found that there is a shift from perceived long-term right-based access mechanisms such as customary law freehold (which includes gift and purchase) and usufructuary (use right for indigenes) to short-term structural and relational access mechanisms such as share contract arrangements (including sharecropping and land rental). Currently, both indigenes and migrants compete for these relational access mechanisms which were once predominantly associated with only migrant farmers. These shifting access dynamics have also led to modification of existing land access strategies, with landowners pursuing re-negotiation arrangements after a fixed term for farmers to retain access to their lands. The evolving access dynamics have triggered a range of responses, including existing migrant farmers’ resistance to renegotiated fixed terms to maintain land access, farmers refusal to rehabilitate old and moribund cocoa farms (as a means to secure their land under cocoa farming), and the emergence of unconventional practices such as sub-letting farms to other farmers and encroachment into forest reserves. Based on the findings of this study, we argue that current land access trends benefit landowners and new migrants over existing migrants, due to difficulties in complying with renegotiated terms, with a further risk of excluding vulnerable groups, such as relatively poor farmers, women and youth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292924000882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper employs historical trends and perspectives of key cocoa sector actors to understand the evolving patterns of land access within Ghana’s cocoa landscapes. Primary data was collected through focus group discussions, questionnaires administered to cocoa farmers, and key informant interviews with farmers, cocoa extension agents and landowners on how access to land is evolving, and the responses of these actors to the dynamics around land access. We found that there is a shift from perceived long-term right-based access mechanisms such as customary law freehold (which includes gift and purchase) and usufructuary (use right for indigenes) to short-term structural and relational access mechanisms such as share contract arrangements (including sharecropping and land rental). Currently, both indigenes and migrants compete for these relational access mechanisms which were once predominantly associated with only migrant farmers. These shifting access dynamics have also led to modification of existing land access strategies, with landowners pursuing re-negotiation arrangements after a fixed term for farmers to retain access to their lands. The evolving access dynamics have triggered a range of responses, including existing migrant farmers’ resistance to renegotiated fixed terms to maintain land access, farmers refusal to rehabilitate old and moribund cocoa farms (as a means to secure their land under cocoa farming), and the emergence of unconventional practices such as sub-letting farms to other farmers and encroachment into forest reserves. Based on the findings of this study, we argue that current land access trends benefit landowners and new migrants over existing migrants, due to difficulties in complying with renegotiated terms, with a further risk of excluding vulnerable groups, such as relatively poor farmers, women and youth.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信