Impact of Different CKD Definitions on Long-Term Renal Function and Mortality in a Population-Based Cohort Study

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Delal Dalga , Aurélie Huber , Anne Dufey , Peter Vollenweider , Pedro Marques-Vidal , Sophie de Seigneux , Belen Ponte , Lena Berchtold
{"title":"Impact of Different CKD Definitions on Long-Term Renal Function and Mortality in a Population-Based Cohort Study","authors":"Delal Dalga ,&nbsp;Aurélie Huber ,&nbsp;Anne Dufey ,&nbsp;Peter Vollenweider ,&nbsp;Pedro Marques-Vidal ,&nbsp;Sophie de Seigneux ,&nbsp;Belen Ponte ,&nbsp;Lena Berchtold","doi":"10.1016/j.ekir.2024.11.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The adoption of age or individualized body surface area (i-BSA) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) thresholds could influence the prevalence and prognosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This longitudinal study with up to 15 years of follow-up in the general population, compares different eGFR thresholds for CKD definition: standard, corrected to i-BSA, and age-stratified. For each, we assessed the prevalence of CKD and the combined impact on rapid renal function decline (RRFD) and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were classified as CKD according to the presence of significant albuminuria and/or different eGFR thresholds as follows: (i) &lt; 60ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; (ii) &lt; 60ml/min corrected to i-BSA; (iii) stratified by age, that is, &lt; 75, &lt; 60 and &lt; 45 ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup> if aged &lt; 40 years, 40 to 65 years, and &gt; 65 years, respectively. We performed adjusted Cox regression analyses to predict RRFD and global mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 4952 participants (54% women; mean age: 52 years). Age-stratified definition resulted in 24 of 677 participants aged &lt; 40 years reclassified as CKD, with no adverse outcomes; whereas 55 of 713 participants aged &gt; 65 years were reclassified as non-CKD, with 12 deaths and 1 RRFD. After multivariate adjustment, the CKD group had a poorer prognosis compared with the non-CKD group independently of the definition used; hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 2.23 (1.59–3.12), 2.06 (1.46–2.90), and 1.64 (1.13–2.38) for the standard, corrected to i-BSA, and age-stratified definitions, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, classification of CKD by age or i-BSA does not appear to improve prediction of RRFD and mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17761,"journal":{"name":"Kidney International Reports","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 386-395"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney International Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024924020497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The adoption of age or individualized body surface area (i-BSA) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) thresholds could influence the prevalence and prognosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This longitudinal study with up to 15 years of follow-up in the general population, compares different eGFR thresholds for CKD definition: standard, corrected to i-BSA, and age-stratified. For each, we assessed the prevalence of CKD and the combined impact on rapid renal function decline (RRFD) and mortality.

Methods

Patients were classified as CKD according to the presence of significant albuminuria and/or different eGFR thresholds as follows: (i) < 60ml/min per 1.73 m2; (ii) < 60ml/min corrected to i-BSA; (iii) stratified by age, that is, < 75, < 60 and < 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 if aged < 40 years, 40 to 65 years, and > 65 years, respectively. We performed adjusted Cox regression analyses to predict RRFD and global mortality.

Results

We analyzed 4952 participants (54% women; mean age: 52 years). Age-stratified definition resulted in 24 of 677 participants aged < 40 years reclassified as CKD, with no adverse outcomes; whereas 55 of 713 participants aged > 65 years were reclassified as non-CKD, with 12 deaths and 1 RRFD. After multivariate adjustment, the CKD group had a poorer prognosis compared with the non-CKD group independently of the definition used; hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 2.23 (1.59–3.12), 2.06 (1.46–2.90), and 1.64 (1.13–2.38) for the standard, corrected to i-BSA, and age-stratified definitions, respectively.

Conclusion

In our study, classification of CKD by age or i-BSA does not appear to improve prediction of RRFD and mortality.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney International Reports
Kidney International Reports Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney International Reports, an official journal of the International Society of Nephrology, is a peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to the publication of leading research and developments related to kidney disease. With the primary aim of contributing to improved care of patients with kidney disease, the journal will publish original clinical and select translational articles and educational content related to the pathogenesis, evaluation and management of acute and chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease (including transplantation), acid-base, fluid and electrolyte disturbances and hypertension. Of particular interest are submissions related to clinical trials, epidemiology, systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) and outcomes research. The journal will also provide a platform for wider dissemination of national and regional guidelines as well as consensus meeting reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信