{"title":"The business case for palliative care: Translating research into program development in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)","authors":"Arun Ghoshal","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Scientific abstract</h3><div>The provision of palliative care is a critical component of comprehensive healthcare, particularly for individuals facing life-limiting illnesses. While the importance of palliative care has been recognized in high-income countries, its integration and implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) pose unique challenges. In LMICs, limited resources, competing health priorities, and cultural factors have historically hindered the development and delivery of palliative care services. However, recent research has demonstrated the numerous benefits of palliative care, including improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.</div><div>A multifaceted approach is needed to develop palliative care programs in LMICs successfully. Firstly, there is a need to raise awareness among policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public about the value and benefits of palliative care. This can be achieved through targeted advocacy campaigns, capacity-building initiatives, and knowledge dissemination. Secondly, program development should be context-specific and tailored to the unique challenges and resources of each LMIC. This includes establishing partnerships with local healthcare providers, integrating palliative care into existing healthcare systems, and developing culturally sensitive models of care. Furthermore, financing mechanisms and sustainable funding sources must be explored to ensure the long-term viability of palliative care programs. This may involve advocating for the integration of palliative care into national health policies, exploring innovative financing models, and leveraging international partnerships and funding opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest abstract</h3><div>The global community has recognized that palliative care is integral to both universal health coverage and the right to health and helps improve the quality of life for people with serious illnesses as well as their caregivers/families. While it is well-established in wealthier countries, implementing palliative care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. In LMICs, limited resources have made it difficult to provide palliative care. However, recent research shows that palliative care brings many benefits, such as better patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. These findings make a strong case for expanding palliative care in LMICs. To make this happen, there is a need to raise awareness about the value of palliative care among policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public. We must also develop tailored programs that consider each country's unique challenges and resources. Finding sustainable funding sources is crucial, which may involve integrating palliative care into national health policies and seeking international partnerships. By embracing palliative care, LMICs can improve the lives of those with serious illnesses, strengthen their healthcare systems, and address the needs of their populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400128X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scientific abstract
The provision of palliative care is a critical component of comprehensive healthcare, particularly for individuals facing life-limiting illnesses. While the importance of palliative care has been recognized in high-income countries, its integration and implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) pose unique challenges. In LMICs, limited resources, competing health priorities, and cultural factors have historically hindered the development and delivery of palliative care services. However, recent research has demonstrated the numerous benefits of palliative care, including improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
A multifaceted approach is needed to develop palliative care programs in LMICs successfully. Firstly, there is a need to raise awareness among policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public about the value and benefits of palliative care. This can be achieved through targeted advocacy campaigns, capacity-building initiatives, and knowledge dissemination. Secondly, program development should be context-specific and tailored to the unique challenges and resources of each LMIC. This includes establishing partnerships with local healthcare providers, integrating palliative care into existing healthcare systems, and developing culturally sensitive models of care. Furthermore, financing mechanisms and sustainable funding sources must be explored to ensure the long-term viability of palliative care programs. This may involve advocating for the integration of palliative care into national health policies, exploring innovative financing models, and leveraging international partnerships and funding opportunities.
Public interest abstract
The global community has recognized that palliative care is integral to both universal health coverage and the right to health and helps improve the quality of life for people with serious illnesses as well as their caregivers/families. While it is well-established in wealthier countries, implementing palliative care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. In LMICs, limited resources have made it difficult to provide palliative care. However, recent research shows that palliative care brings many benefits, such as better patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. These findings make a strong case for expanding palliative care in LMICs. To make this happen, there is a need to raise awareness about the value of palliative care among policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public. We must also develop tailored programs that consider each country's unique challenges and resources. Finding sustainable funding sources is crucial, which may involve integrating palliative care into national health policies and seeking international partnerships. By embracing palliative care, LMICs can improve the lives of those with serious illnesses, strengthen their healthcare systems, and address the needs of their populations.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics