Quantification of microwear on experimental shell tools: First results using focus variation microscopy, surface roughness, and multiscale geometric analyses

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Danielle A. Macdonald , Naomi L. Martisius , W. James Stemp , Christopher A. Brown , Logan Guthrie , Matthew A. Gleason
{"title":"Quantification of microwear on experimental shell tools: First results using focus variation microscopy, surface roughness, and multiscale geometric analyses","authors":"Danielle A. Macdonald ,&nbsp;Naomi L. Martisius ,&nbsp;W. James Stemp ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Brown ,&nbsp;Logan Guthrie ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Gleason","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.104986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaeologists have increasingly adopted approaches from engineering and materials sciences to quantify the surfaces of artifacts and ecofacts. Different microscope systems and surface texture/roughness parameters have been employed with various degrees of success. Although most studies have focused on chipped stone tools and animal bones, to date there has been no attempt to quantify microwear on shell tools. In this study, focus variation microscopy was used to mathematically document the surfaces on the edges of twelve little neck clam shells in both unused and used conditions. The clam shells were used to scrape a variety of materials, including fresh, greasy bone, untanned leather, and sweet potato (hard vegetable). Microwear was calculated from the surface measurements taken on the used and unused shell edges using multiple ISO parameters, including conventional height parameters and multiscale geometric analysis (relative area; area-scale complexity). The results of this experiment indicate that the quantification of microwear on shell tools is possible and that shell, as a raw material, may present challenges in terms of surface texture/roughness documentation. Discussion of the results includes an assessment of which parameters may be best for distinguishing used from unused shell tool surfaces and the surfaces of shell tools used on different contact materials, and possible problems resulting from post-depositional processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 104986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeologists have increasingly adopted approaches from engineering and materials sciences to quantify the surfaces of artifacts and ecofacts. Different microscope systems and surface texture/roughness parameters have been employed with various degrees of success. Although most studies have focused on chipped stone tools and animal bones, to date there has been no attempt to quantify microwear on shell tools. In this study, focus variation microscopy was used to mathematically document the surfaces on the edges of twelve little neck clam shells in both unused and used conditions. The clam shells were used to scrape a variety of materials, including fresh, greasy bone, untanned leather, and sweet potato (hard vegetable). Microwear was calculated from the surface measurements taken on the used and unused shell edges using multiple ISO parameters, including conventional height parameters and multiscale geometric analysis (relative area; area-scale complexity). The results of this experiment indicate that the quantification of microwear on shell tools is possible and that shell, as a raw material, may present challenges in terms of surface texture/roughness documentation. Discussion of the results includes an assessment of which parameters may be best for distinguishing used from unused shell tool surfaces and the surfaces of shell tools used on different contact materials, and possible problems resulting from post-depositional processes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信