Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mirza Noor Ali Baig , Zafar Fatmi , Nadeem Ullah Khan , Uzma Rahim Khan , Ahmed Raheem , Junaid Abdul Razzak
{"title":"Effectiveness of chain of survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries: A systematic review","authors":"Mirza Noor Ali Baig ,&nbsp;Zafar Fatmi ,&nbsp;Nadeem Ullah Khan ,&nbsp;Uzma Rahim Khan ,&nbsp;Ahmed Raheem ,&nbsp;Junaid Abdul Razzak","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Given the critical disparities in survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries and the lack of context-specific evidence to guide resuscitation practices, we aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the chain of survival components including bystander response, emergency medical services (EMS) response, advanced life support, and post-resuscitation care on outcomes such as return of spontaneous circulation, survival to admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcomes in these settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, included observational and interventional studies on OHCA management from low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries, published in English (2004–2023). PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched using predefined terms. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data using the Utstein template, and resolved conflicts with a third reviewer. Data included pre-hospital, patient, and post-resuscitation care factors, as well as short and long-term outcomes. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted, with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates compared across income groups using <em>t</em>-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen (16) eligible studies were included. No study was found from low-income countries. ROSC rates ranged from 0.7% to 44%, survival to discharge from 0.6% to 14.1%, and good neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) from 0.6% to 53.8%. While upper-middle-income countries showed slightly higher ROSC rates, differences were not statistically significant. Risk of bias was moderate to high due to selection bias, inadequate confounding control, and inconsistent reporting. These findings emphasize the need for standardized reporting and further research to improve outcomes in resource limited countries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights low survival rates for OHCA in resource limited countries, with significant variability and gaps in evidence. Strengthening EMS systems, adopting context-specific strategies, and standardizing reporting are critical to improving outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Given the critical disparities in survival for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) in resource limited countries and the lack of context-specific evidence to guide resuscitation practices, we aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the chain of survival components including bystander response, emergency medical services (EMS) response, advanced life support, and post-resuscitation care on outcomes such as return of spontaneous circulation, survival to admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcomes in these settings.

Methods

This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, included observational and interventional studies on OHCA management from low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries, published in English (2004–2023). PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched using predefined terms. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data using the Utstein template, and resolved conflicts with a third reviewer. Data included pre-hospital, patient, and post-resuscitation care factors, as well as short and long-term outcomes. Descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted, with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates compared across income groups using t-tests.

Results

Sixteen (16) eligible studies were included. No study was found from low-income countries. ROSC rates ranged from 0.7% to 44%, survival to discharge from 0.6% to 14.1%, and good neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) from 0.6% to 53.8%. While upper-middle-income countries showed slightly higher ROSC rates, differences were not statistically significant. Risk of bias was moderate to high due to selection bias, inadequate confounding control, and inconsistent reporting. These findings emphasize the need for standardized reporting and further research to improve outcomes in resource limited countries.

Conclusion

This review highlights low survival rates for OHCA in resource limited countries, with significant variability and gaps in evidence. Strengthening EMS systems, adopting context-specific strategies, and standardizing reporting are critical to improving outcomes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信