Efecto del aprendizaje basado en juegos en las habilidades de pensamiento de orden superior en matemáticas de los estudiantes: un metanálisis

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bambang Sri Anggoro , Andi Harpeni Dewantara , Suherman Suherman , Rosida Rakhmawati Muhammad , Sari Saraswati
{"title":"Efecto del aprendizaje basado en juegos en las habilidades de pensamiento de orden superior en matemáticas de los estudiantes: un metanálisis","authors":"Bambang Sri Anggoro ,&nbsp;Andi Harpeni Dewantara ,&nbsp;Suherman Suherman ,&nbsp;Rosida Rakhmawati Muhammad ,&nbsp;Sari Saraswati","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2024.500158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational research trends demonstrate a growing interest in understanding the impact of games on mathematics achievement. However, only a limited number of studies have synthesized previous quantitative studies to investigate how game-based learning (GBL) influences the enhancement of students’ high-order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics. To address this gap, this meta-analysis study aims to investigate the effectiveness of GBL on students’ mathematics HOTS. The study analyzed 40 effect sizes from 13 empirical studies published from 2010 to 2024, gathered from electronic databases such as Scopus, Eric, and Pro-Quest. R software was employed for analyzing effect sizes, detecting publication bias, and conducting subgroup analyses. Using the k-means algorithm, two studies identified as outliers were excluded. After removing these outliers, the findings revealed a positive effect of GBL on students’ mathematics HOTS, with an overall effect falling within the small category (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.134, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). Additionally, moderator variables, including educational level, measured thinking skills, continent, control treatment, and intervention duration, significantly influenced the improvement of HOTS using GBL, while the sample size factor showed no significant impact. All findings, limitations, and implications are discussed in this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":"30 1","pages":"Article 500158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103424000200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational research trends demonstrate a growing interest in understanding the impact of games on mathematics achievement. However, only a limited number of studies have synthesized previous quantitative studies to investigate how game-based learning (GBL) influences the enhancement of students’ high-order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics. To address this gap, this meta-analysis study aims to investigate the effectiveness of GBL on students’ mathematics HOTS. The study analyzed 40 effect sizes from 13 empirical studies published from 2010 to 2024, gathered from electronic databases such as Scopus, Eric, and Pro-Quest. R software was employed for analyzing effect sizes, detecting publication bias, and conducting subgroup analyses. Using the k-means algorithm, two studies identified as outliers were excluded. After removing these outliers, the findings revealed a positive effect of GBL on students’ mathematics HOTS, with an overall effect falling within the small category (g = .134, p < .001). Additionally, moderator variables, including educational level, measured thinking skills, continent, control treatment, and intervention duration, significantly influenced the improvement of HOTS using GBL, while the sample size factor showed no significant impact. All findings, limitations, and implications are discussed in this article.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信