Analysing the impact of money supply on economic growth: A panel regression approach for Western Balkan countries (2000–2023)

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Roberta Bajrami , Saranda Tafa , Adelina Gashi , Medain Hashani
{"title":"Analysing the impact of money supply on economic growth: A panel regression approach for Western Balkan countries (2000–2023)","authors":"Roberta Bajrami ,&nbsp;Saranda Tafa ,&nbsp;Adelina Gashi ,&nbsp;Medain Hashani","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study used panel data analysis to investigate the relationship between economic growth and some selected macroeconomic variables such as the money supply, inflation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and government spending. The study used Fixed Effects (FE), Random Effects (RE), and Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimations to emphasise the importance of these variables in driving economic growth. The Fixed Effects model indicates that the money supply (M2) has a positive and significant impact on economic growth (coefficient of 0.032, p &lt; 0.05), while inflation has a negative impact (coefficient of −0.045, p &lt; 0.05). The Random Effects model shows comparable patterns, with money supply and inflation coefficients of 0.028 (p &lt; 0.05) and −0.038 (p &lt; 0.10), respectively. According to the RE model, FDI has a positive impact on growth (coefficient = 0.021, p &lt; 0.10). However, government spending (GOVEXP) remains statistically insignificant in both scenarios. The GMM calculation confirms that money supply (0.027, p &lt; 0.05) and inflation (-0.042, p &lt; 0.05) have a significant positive and negative impact on economic growth, respectively. FDI contributes favourably with a coefficient of 0.024 (p &lt; 0.10), while government expenditure is insignificant. Lagged GDP growth is a significant factor, with a coefficient of 0.215 (p &lt; 0.05), indicating sustained economic expansion throughout time. The findings emphasise the importance of monetary policy, inflation management, and attracting foreign direct investment in encouraging long-term economic growth, while government spending appears to have less influence in the short run. These findings offer policymakers evidence-based recommendations for developing effective economic strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used panel data analysis to investigate the relationship between economic growth and some selected macroeconomic variables such as the money supply, inflation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and government spending. The study used Fixed Effects (FE), Random Effects (RE), and Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimations to emphasise the importance of these variables in driving economic growth. The Fixed Effects model indicates that the money supply (M2) has a positive and significant impact on economic growth (coefficient of 0.032, p < 0.05), while inflation has a negative impact (coefficient of −0.045, p < 0.05). The Random Effects model shows comparable patterns, with money supply and inflation coefficients of 0.028 (p < 0.05) and −0.038 (p < 0.10), respectively. According to the RE model, FDI has a positive impact on growth (coefficient = 0.021, p < 0.10). However, government spending (GOVEXP) remains statistically insignificant in both scenarios. The GMM calculation confirms that money supply (0.027, p < 0.05) and inflation (-0.042, p < 0.05) have a significant positive and negative impact on economic growth, respectively. FDI contributes favourably with a coefficient of 0.024 (p < 0.10), while government expenditure is insignificant. Lagged GDP growth is a significant factor, with a coefficient of 0.215 (p < 0.05), indicating sustained economic expansion throughout time. The findings emphasise the importance of monetary policy, inflation management, and attracting foreign direct investment in encouraging long-term economic growth, while government spending appears to have less influence in the short run. These findings offer policymakers evidence-based recommendations for developing effective economic strategies.
货币供给对经济增长的影响分析:西巴尔干国家的面板回归方法(2000-2023)
本研究采用面板数据分析,考察经济增长与货币供应量、通货膨胀、外国直接投资(FDI)和政府支出等宏观经济变量之间的关系。该研究使用固定效应(FE)、随机效应(RE)和广义矩量法(GMM)估计来强调这些变量在推动经济增长方面的重要性。固定效应模型表明,货币供应量(M2)对经济增长有显著的正向影响(系数为0.032,p <; 0.05),而通货膨胀对经济增长有负向影响(系数为- 0.045,p <; 0.05)。随机效应模型显示了类似的模式,货币供应量和通货膨胀系数分别为0.028 (p <; 0.05)和- 0.038 (p <; 0.10)。根据RE模型,FDI对经济增长具有正向影响(系数= 0.021,p <; 0.10)。然而,在这两种情况下,政府支出(GOVEXP)在统计上仍然微不足道。GMM计算证实,货币供应量(0.027,p <; 0.05)和通货膨胀率(-0.042,p <; 0.05)分别对经济增长有显著的正向和负向影响。FDI的贡献系数为0.024 (p <; 0.10),而政府支出的贡献不显著。滞后的GDP增长是一个显著因素,其系数为0.215 (p <; 0.05),表明经济持续扩张。研究结果强调了货币政策、通胀管理和吸引外国直接投资在鼓励长期经济增长方面的重要性,而政府支出在短期内的影响似乎较小。这些发现为决策者制定有效的经济战略提供了基于证据的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信