Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity-Revised (PIOS-R) across Christian, Jewish, and Muslim groups

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Fiona C. Ball , Anna M. White , Johanna A. Younce , Kevin D. Wu
{"title":"Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity-Revised (PIOS-R) across Christian, Jewish, and Muslim groups","authors":"Fiona C. Ball ,&nbsp;Anna M. White ,&nbsp;Johanna A. Younce ,&nbsp;Kevin D. Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The revised Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS-R) is widely used. Support for its factor structure is mixed across either a two-factor or a bifactor model. Normed on a primarily Christian sample, researchers use the PIOS-R to examine scrupulosity across religious groups. This study's primary aims were to clarify the PIOS-R's factor structure in a religiously diverse sample and determine whether the PIOS-R shows measurement invariance across religious groups. A secondary aim was to evaluate psychometric properties. U.S. participants (<em>N</em> = 718) who self-reported as Christian, Jewish, or Muslim were recruited using MTurk. Multiple group CFA indicated that a two-factor solution comprised of Fear of God (FOG) and Fear of Sin (FOS) provided the best-fitting model. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance held across religious groups. Internal consistency was strong for the full scale (<em>ω</em><sub>t</sub> = .96) and both FOS (<em>ω</em><sub>t</sub> = .95) and FOG (<em>ω</em><sub>t</sub> = .92) subscales. The PIOS-R was more strongly correlated with DOCS Scrupulosity (<em>r</em> = .71) than with DASS-21 Depression (<em>r</em> = .58), DASS-21 Anxiety (<em>r</em> = .66), or a measure of religiosity (SCSRFQ; <em>r</em> = .36), supporting relative discriminant validity. The PIOS-R appears appropriate for assessing scrupulosity within and among these religious groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The revised Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS-R) is widely used. Support for its factor structure is mixed across either a two-factor or a bifactor model. Normed on a primarily Christian sample, researchers use the PIOS-R to examine scrupulosity across religious groups. This study's primary aims were to clarify the PIOS-R's factor structure in a religiously diverse sample and determine whether the PIOS-R shows measurement invariance across religious groups. A secondary aim was to evaluate psychometric properties. U.S. participants (N = 718) who self-reported as Christian, Jewish, or Muslim were recruited using MTurk. Multiple group CFA indicated that a two-factor solution comprised of Fear of God (FOG) and Fear of Sin (FOS) provided the best-fitting model. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance held across religious groups. Internal consistency was strong for the full scale (ωt = .96) and both FOS (ωt = .95) and FOG (ωt = .92) subscales. The PIOS-R was more strongly correlated with DOCS Scrupulosity (r = .71) than with DASS-21 Depression (r = .58), DASS-21 Anxiety (r = .66), or a measure of religiosity (SCSRFQ; r = .36), supporting relative discriminant validity. The PIOS-R appears appropriate for assessing scrupulosity within and among these religious groups.
基督教、犹太教和穆斯林群体的Penn审慎性量表(PIOS-R)的因素结构和测量不变性
修订后的Penn清单(PIOS-R)被广泛使用。对其因素结构的支持在双因素或双因素模型中混合。研究人员主要以基督教为样本,使用PIOS-R来检查宗教团体的诚信。本研究的主要目的是澄清PIOS-R在不同宗教样本中的因素结构,并确定PIOS-R是否在不同宗教群体中表现出测量不变性。第二个目的是评估心理测量特性。美国参与者(N = 718)自称是基督徒、犹太人或穆斯林,他们是通过MTurk招募的。多组CFA表明,由对上帝的恐惧(FOG)和对罪恶的恐惧(FOS)组成的双因素解决方案提供了最佳拟合模型。构型、度量和标量不变性跨越宗教团体。完整量表(ωt = 0.96)、FOS (ωt = 0.95)和FOG (ωt = 0.92)子量表的内部一致性很强。与DASS-21抑郁(r = 0.58)、DASS-21焦虑(r = 0.66)或宗教虔诚度(SCSRFQ;R = 0.36),支持相对区别效度。PIOS-R似乎适合于评估这些宗教团体内部和之间的审慎程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信