Composition and origin of the first millennium AD glass uncovered at Khirbet adh-Dharih, south Jordan

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Khaled Al-Bashaireh , Ian C. Freestone , François Villeneuve , Zeidoun Al-Muheisen , Tom Gregory
{"title":"Composition and origin of the first millennium AD glass uncovered at Khirbet adh-Dharih, south Jordan","authors":"Khaled Al-Bashaireh ,&nbsp;Ian C. Freestone ,&nbsp;François Villeneuve ,&nbsp;Zeidoun Al-Muheisen ,&nbsp;Tom Gregory","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sixty-four glasses excavated at Khirbet adh-Dharih, south Jordan, and archaeologically dated from the Roman to Early Abbasid periods were analyzed by wavelength-dispersive electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The majority of the glasses (57) were fluxed with natron. In the Roman period antimony-decolorized glass from Egypt, manganese-decolorized glass from the Levant and recycled Roman MnSb glass are present. From the middle of the fourth century glass from the Levantine production centers Jalame and Apollonia dominates the assemblage up to the eighth century, when glass from Bet Eli’ezer becomes common, consistent with previous findings from the North. Egypt I and II types also occur at this time, consistent with previous findings from the wider region indicating that Egyptian glass continued to be imported into the Levant in the 8-9th centuries. Plant ash glass is represented from Mesopotamia, from Tyre and from unidentified sources in Egypt or Syria. Overall, these results suggest that glass from a wider range of sources was being exploited in the early Islamic period than in Byzantine times. Evidence for recycling is particularly apparent in the Apollonia-type glasses but is hardly noticed in the Bet Eli’ezer-type, consistent with a greater dependency on local resources in the sixth-seventh centuries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 105003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sixty-four glasses excavated at Khirbet adh-Dharih, south Jordan, and archaeologically dated from the Roman to Early Abbasid periods were analyzed by wavelength-dispersive electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The majority of the glasses (57) were fluxed with natron. In the Roman period antimony-decolorized glass from Egypt, manganese-decolorized glass from the Levant and recycled Roman MnSb glass are present. From the middle of the fourth century glass from the Levantine production centers Jalame and Apollonia dominates the assemblage up to the eighth century, when glass from Bet Eli’ezer becomes common, consistent with previous findings from the North. Egypt I and II types also occur at this time, consistent with previous findings from the wider region indicating that Egyptian glass continued to be imported into the Levant in the 8-9th centuries. Plant ash glass is represented from Mesopotamia, from Tyre and from unidentified sources in Egypt or Syria. Overall, these results suggest that glass from a wider range of sources was being exploited in the early Islamic period than in Byzantine times. Evidence for recycling is particularly apparent in the Apollonia-type glasses but is hardly noticed in the Bet Eli’ezer-type, consistent with a greater dependency on local resources in the sixth-seventh centuries.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信