Associations between emotion regulation, symptom severity, and affect in obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nicola Hohensee , Claudia Bischof , Fanny Alexandra Dietel , Nadja Klein , Philipp Doebler , Ulrike Buhlmann
{"title":"Associations between emotion regulation, symptom severity, and affect in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Nicola Hohensee ,&nbsp;Claudia Bischof ,&nbsp;Fanny Alexandra Dietel ,&nbsp;Nadja Klein ,&nbsp;Philipp Doebler ,&nbsp;Ulrike Buhlmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous cross-sectional, retrospective studies have shown associations between dysfunctional emotion regulation (ER) and obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms. No studies to date have, however, used intensive longitudinal designs to assess the theoretically proposed, yet empirically understudied dynamic relations between momentary OC symptoms, affect, and ER. Up to six times a day across six days, <em>n</em> = 68 individuals with OCD and <em>n</em> = 43 mentally healthy controls reported engagement-oriented and avoidance-oriented ER strategies, self-perceived ER effectiveness, negative and positive affect, and OC symptoms. We investigated associations between ER behavior and current outcomes (i.e., affect or symptoms in the moment) as well as subsequent outcomes (i.e., 1–2 h later). Results showed that higher-than-usual self-perceived ER effectiveness was associated with higher current positive affect and lower current negative affect and OC symptoms. Use of avoidance-oriented ER strategies was also partly associated with less beneficial outcomes. Effects for engagement-oriented ER strategies were mostly non-significant, except from a negative association with subsequent OC symptoms. All other associations with subsequent outcomes did not reach statistical significance. One possible explanation may be the overall low endorsement of ER strategies across groups. Future studies with varying study designs are needed. Constraints on generality and possible clinical implications are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous cross-sectional, retrospective studies have shown associations between dysfunctional emotion regulation (ER) and obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms. No studies to date have, however, used intensive longitudinal designs to assess the theoretically proposed, yet empirically understudied dynamic relations between momentary OC symptoms, affect, and ER. Up to six times a day across six days, n = 68 individuals with OCD and n = 43 mentally healthy controls reported engagement-oriented and avoidance-oriented ER strategies, self-perceived ER effectiveness, negative and positive affect, and OC symptoms. We investigated associations between ER behavior and current outcomes (i.e., affect or symptoms in the moment) as well as subsequent outcomes (i.e., 1–2 h later). Results showed that higher-than-usual self-perceived ER effectiveness was associated with higher current positive affect and lower current negative affect and OC symptoms. Use of avoidance-oriented ER strategies was also partly associated with less beneficial outcomes. Effects for engagement-oriented ER strategies were mostly non-significant, except from a negative association with subsequent OC symptoms. All other associations with subsequent outcomes did not reach statistical significance. One possible explanation may be the overall low endorsement of ER strategies across groups. Future studies with varying study designs are needed. Constraints on generality and possible clinical implications are also discussed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信