Total fluorine analysis in solid samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis coupled with the internal standard method

IF 4.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Tsutomu Miura
{"title":"Total fluorine analysis in solid samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis coupled with the internal standard method","authors":"Tsutomu Miura","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2025.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is a valuable technique for quantifying F; however, it is associated with significant measurement uncertainty, which can be reduced by combining INAA with the internal standard method. In this study, known amounts of Sc were added to both samples and calibration standards to compensate for variations in the fluence rates of the irradiated neutrons and measurements of the γ-rays. The <sup>46m</sup>Sc produced during neutron irradiation was used as the internal standard. Data were collected using two approaches: a single irradiation for 5 s followed by a 10 s γ-ray measurement, and a cyclic method involving five repetitions of the single irradiation and γ-ray measurements. Normalization of the counting rate using the internal standard effectively eliminated day-to-day variations, and a reliable relationship was established between the normalized signal and the amount of F. The proposed method produced a robust and highly linear calibration plot, enabling the accurate quantification of the mass fraction of F. The analytical performance of the proposed method was validated using certified reference materials before using it to quantify the mass fraction of F in commercially available synthetic polymer resins. The cyclic irradiation method, which required approximately 30 min for measurement, yielded a lower expanded uncertainty in the mass fraction of F compared with the single irradiation method, in which measurements were completed within 30 s. Consequently, the single irradiation method was more suitable for screening, whereas the cyclic irradiation method was more suitable for the precise quantification of F.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831925000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is a valuable technique for quantifying F; however, it is associated with significant measurement uncertainty, which can be reduced by combining INAA with the internal standard method. In this study, known amounts of Sc were added to both samples and calibration standards to compensate for variations in the fluence rates of the irradiated neutrons and measurements of the γ-rays. The 46mSc produced during neutron irradiation was used as the internal standard. Data were collected using two approaches: a single irradiation for 5 s followed by a 10 s γ-ray measurement, and a cyclic method involving five repetitions of the single irradiation and γ-ray measurements. Normalization of the counting rate using the internal standard effectively eliminated day-to-day variations, and a reliable relationship was established between the normalized signal and the amount of F. The proposed method produced a robust and highly linear calibration plot, enabling the accurate quantification of the mass fraction of F. The analytical performance of the proposed method was validated using certified reference materials before using it to quantify the mass fraction of F in commercially available synthetic polymer resins. The cyclic irradiation method, which required approximately 30 min for measurement, yielded a lower expanded uncertainty in the mass fraction of F compared with the single irradiation method, in which measurements were completed within 30 s. Consequently, the single irradiation method was more suitable for screening, whereas the cyclic irradiation method was more suitable for the precise quantification of F.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Talanta Open
Talanta Open Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信