Stigmatizing attitudes and endorsement of coercive interventions for hoarding

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Persephone Larkin , Simon B. Sheppard , Christiana Bratiotis , Sheila R. Woody
{"title":"Stigmatizing attitudes and endorsement of coercive interventions for hoarding","authors":"Persephone Larkin ,&nbsp;Simon B. Sheppard ,&nbsp;Christiana Bratiotis ,&nbsp;Sheila R. Woody","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hoarding disorder is a stigmatized condition, but little research has examined the attitudes of professional service providers who encounter hoarding in homes they enter as part of their work. These providers have essential roles in identifying and intervening with hoarding, but the degree to which they hold stigmatizing attitudes has not been studied. Using an online questionnaire, the present study sought to compare hoarding service providers with non-professionals along several dimensions of hoarding stigma: blame, desire for social distance, stereotypes about incompetence, and the endorsement of coercive treatment methods were examined. Overall, members of the professional sample endorsed less blame and desire for social distance from hoarding clients. However, the samples did not differ in beliefs about the incompetence of hoarding clients or endorsement of coercive methods in hoarding interventions. Stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness in general consistently predicted hoarding stigma in both samples. Providers who expressed more professional confidence in working with hoarding endorsed less blaming attitudes and less desire for social distance, but providers who work in more enforcement-oriented roles endorsed desire for more social distance from hoarding clients. This study provides a first glimpse at hoarding-related stigma among professional service providers, and further insight into the general public's perception of hoarding relative to other mental illnesses. Findings about the predictors of hoarding stigma provide potential directions for anti-stigma interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hoarding disorder is a stigmatized condition, but little research has examined the attitudes of professional service providers who encounter hoarding in homes they enter as part of their work. These providers have essential roles in identifying and intervening with hoarding, but the degree to which they hold stigmatizing attitudes has not been studied. Using an online questionnaire, the present study sought to compare hoarding service providers with non-professionals along several dimensions of hoarding stigma: blame, desire for social distance, stereotypes about incompetence, and the endorsement of coercive treatment methods were examined. Overall, members of the professional sample endorsed less blame and desire for social distance from hoarding clients. However, the samples did not differ in beliefs about the incompetence of hoarding clients or endorsement of coercive methods in hoarding interventions. Stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness in general consistently predicted hoarding stigma in both samples. Providers who expressed more professional confidence in working with hoarding endorsed less blaming attitudes and less desire for social distance, but providers who work in more enforcement-oriented roles endorsed desire for more social distance from hoarding clients. This study provides a first glimpse at hoarding-related stigma among professional service providers, and further insight into the general public's perception of hoarding relative to other mental illnesses. Findings about the predictors of hoarding stigma provide potential directions for anti-stigma interventions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions. Suitable topics for manuscripts include: -The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders -Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena -OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts -Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions -Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies -Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders -Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders -Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信