Accurate measurement of particle velocity using a double disc anemometer in erosive wear experiments

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
William Cashmore , Alexander Blanchard , Getu Hailu
{"title":"Accurate measurement of particle velocity using a double disc anemometer in erosive wear experiments","authors":"William Cashmore ,&nbsp;Alexander Blanchard ,&nbsp;Getu Hailu","doi":"10.1016/j.triboint.2024.110439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately characterizing abrasive particle velocity ejected from a nozzle in a pressurized airflow is crucial for solid particle erosion quantification, abrasive jet micromachining, and abrasive slurry micro-jet experiments. A double-disc anemometer (DDA) is an economical particle velocity measurement apparatus which is cost effective to implement. The DDA method determines particle velocity using the time it takes for particles to travel a known distance between two rotating discs mounted on the same shaft. Since 1975, the DDA has been used to measure solid particle velocities in gas-particulate flow streams. Particle velocity measurement using a DDA is an intricate process, which the experimental procedure lacks published standardization outlining, operation procedures, comprehensive error analysis, and post-processing advice, all required to report accurate and reliable results. This paper presents a new and improved DDA design, automated post-processing procedures, and experimental validation characterizing the flow development of <span><math><mrow><mn>66</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> glass bead abrasive blasted with a maximum mean particle velocity of <span><math><mrow><mn>95.3</mn><mi>m</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></math></span>. State-of-the-art laser Doppler velocimetry equipment (LDV) was used to validate the DDA results with an agreement of −2.8 % on average. Further, this paper investigates the disc separation distance and shaft angular velocity, discussing configuration recommendations for reliable measurements, with an optimal reported uncertainty of ± 3.2 %. Finally, a novel scarring analysis method was conducted to identify the intricacies of how the instrument’s geometries affect the velocity calculation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23238,"journal":{"name":"Tribology International","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 110439"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology International","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679X24011915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately characterizing abrasive particle velocity ejected from a nozzle in a pressurized airflow is crucial for solid particle erosion quantification, abrasive jet micromachining, and abrasive slurry micro-jet experiments. A double-disc anemometer (DDA) is an economical particle velocity measurement apparatus which is cost effective to implement. The DDA method determines particle velocity using the time it takes for particles to travel a known distance between two rotating discs mounted on the same shaft. Since 1975, the DDA has been used to measure solid particle velocities in gas-particulate flow streams. Particle velocity measurement using a DDA is an intricate process, which the experimental procedure lacks published standardization outlining, operation procedures, comprehensive error analysis, and post-processing advice, all required to report accurate and reliable results. This paper presents a new and improved DDA design, automated post-processing procedures, and experimental validation characterizing the flow development of 66μm glass bead abrasive blasted with a maximum mean particle velocity of 95.3m/s. State-of-the-art laser Doppler velocimetry equipment (LDV) was used to validate the DDA results with an agreement of −2.8 % on average. Further, this paper investigates the disc separation distance and shaft angular velocity, discussing configuration recommendations for reliable measurements, with an optimal reported uncertainty of ± 3.2 %. Finally, a novel scarring analysis method was conducted to identify the intricacies of how the instrument’s geometries affect the velocity calculation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tribology International
Tribology International 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
16.10%
发文量
627
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Tribology is the science of rubbing surfaces and contributes to every facet of our everyday life, from live cell friction to engine lubrication and seismology. As such tribology is truly multidisciplinary and this extraordinary breadth of scientific interest is reflected in the scope of Tribology International. Tribology International seeks to publish original research papers of the highest scientific quality to provide an archival resource for scientists from all backgrounds. Written contributions are invited reporting experimental and modelling studies both in established areas of tribology and emerging fields. Scientific topics include the physics or chemistry of tribo-surfaces, bio-tribology, surface engineering and materials, contact mechanics, nano-tribology, lubricants and hydrodynamic lubrication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信