Reforming plastic packaging regulation: Outcomes from stakeholder interviews and regulatory analysis

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hope Johnson , Katherine Keane , Laura McGillivray , Afshin Akhtar-Khavari , Lewis Chambers , Christopher Barner-Kowollik , Mark Lauchs , James Blinco
{"title":"Reforming plastic packaging regulation: Outcomes from stakeholder interviews and regulatory analysis","authors":"Hope Johnson ,&nbsp;Katherine Keane ,&nbsp;Laura McGillivray ,&nbsp;Afshin Akhtar-Khavari ,&nbsp;Lewis Chambers ,&nbsp;Christopher Barner-Kowollik ,&nbsp;Mark Lauchs ,&nbsp;James Blinco","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regulators worldwide are considering how to significantly improve the regulation of plastic packaging in response to the world's plastic pollution crisis and the future UN treaty on plastics. In Australia, where plastic packaging regulations have remained largely unchanged for over two decades, the government now aims to introduce comprehensive reforms. This study, which brings together a team of chemists and lawyers, seeks to understand the key reform options and the ways in which these interventions should be designed to ensure accountability and sustainability and avoid unintended consequences. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty-six (26) stakeholders within the plastic packaging sector from leading government, industry and civil society bodies. A qualitative analysis was conducted of the interviews to identify common ground among stakeholders regarding reform options and to develop an understanding of the various issues regulators would need to consider when developing new regulations for plastic packaging. This qualitative component was interlinked to a regulatory analysis of both the broad trends in laws and policies for plastic packaging worldwide and Australia's existing regulatory responses to plastic packaging. Results show that stakeholders commonly agree on several regulatory interventions, but that each intervention brings a host of complexities within the current system that regulators will need to address to ensure success. This paper's findings are valuable for actors seeking to improve plastic packaging regulation within their own jurisdiction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003609","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulators worldwide are considering how to significantly improve the regulation of plastic packaging in response to the world's plastic pollution crisis and the future UN treaty on plastics. In Australia, where plastic packaging regulations have remained largely unchanged for over two decades, the government now aims to introduce comprehensive reforms. This study, which brings together a team of chemists and lawyers, seeks to understand the key reform options and the ways in which these interventions should be designed to ensure accountability and sustainability and avoid unintended consequences. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty-six (26) stakeholders within the plastic packaging sector from leading government, industry and civil society bodies. A qualitative analysis was conducted of the interviews to identify common ground among stakeholders regarding reform options and to develop an understanding of the various issues regulators would need to consider when developing new regulations for plastic packaging. This qualitative component was interlinked to a regulatory analysis of both the broad trends in laws and policies for plastic packaging worldwide and Australia's existing regulatory responses to plastic packaging. Results show that stakeholders commonly agree on several regulatory interventions, but that each intervention brings a host of complexities within the current system that regulators will need to address to ensure success. This paper's findings are valuable for actors seeking to improve plastic packaging regulation within their own jurisdiction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信