Academics' information needs from the librarians' perspective: A study of the research community of practice

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Anna Mierzecka
{"title":"Academics' information needs from the librarians' perspective: A study of the research community of practice","authors":"Anna Mierzecka","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.103004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The diversification of academic roles can lead to work overload, with significant consequences for well-being. In this context, the academic library's role in supporting research has become crucial. This study aimed to examine the relationship between academics and librarians based on the practices offered to support research activities, and the relevance of Community of Practice (CoP) theory in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Eighteen in-depth interviews with academic librarians from public universities in Poland were conducted. A thematic narrative approach emphasized the local context of the findings while grounding them in a broader context of international observations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study shows that at all stages of scholarly communication, we observe interactions between academics and librarians. Although the level and type of these interactions differ depending on the stage and the institution, they are a rich source of knowledge about academics' needs. While organizing access to print and digital collections remains an essential part of their duties, the emphasis of their activities is shifting from collection management to service provision. These efforts lead to shared practices that constitute the community as defined in CoP theory, even though at the preliminary stage, it is often still unrecognized, invisible to the organization and even to some members.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 103004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The diversification of academic roles can lead to work overload, with significant consequences for well-being. In this context, the academic library's role in supporting research has become crucial. This study aimed to examine the relationship between academics and librarians based on the practices offered to support research activities, and the relevance of Community of Practice (CoP) theory in this context.

Method

Eighteen in-depth interviews with academic librarians from public universities in Poland were conducted. A thematic narrative approach emphasized the local context of the findings while grounding them in a broader context of international observations.

Results

This study shows that at all stages of scholarly communication, we observe interactions between academics and librarians. Although the level and type of these interactions differ depending on the stage and the institution, they are a rich source of knowledge about academics' needs. While organizing access to print and digital collections remains an essential part of their duties, the emphasis of their activities is shifting from collection management to service provision. These efforts lead to shared practices that constitute the community as defined in CoP theory, even though at the preliminary stage, it is often still unrecognized, invisible to the organization and even to some members.
图书馆馆员视角下的学术信息需求:实践研究界的研究
学术角色的多样化可能导致工作负荷过重,对健康产生重大影响。在这种背景下,高校图书馆在支持研究方面的作用变得至关重要。本研究旨在基于支持研究活动的实践来考察学者和图书馆员之间的关系,以及实践共同体(CoP)理论在这一背景下的相关性。方法对来自波兰公立大学的学术图书馆员进行了18次深度访谈。专题叙述方法强调调查结果的当地背景,同时将其置于国际观察的更广泛背景中。结果本研究表明,在学术交流的各个阶段,我们都观察到学者与图书馆员之间的互动。尽管这些互动的水平和类型因阶段和机构而异,但它们是关于学者需求的丰富知识来源。虽然组织对印刷和数字馆藏的访问仍然是其职责的重要组成部分,但其活动的重点正在从馆藏管理转向提供服务。这些努力导致了共同的实践,这些实践构成了CoP理论中定义的社区,尽管在初步阶段,它通常仍然不被组织甚至一些成员认识到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信