Estimation of soil moisture of a high Andean wetland ecosystem (Bofedal) with geo-radar data and In-Situ measurements, Ayacucho - Peru

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wilmer Moncada , Alex Pereda , Manuel Masías , Manuel Lagos , Edwin Portal-Quicaña , Cristhian Aldana , Yesenia Saavedra , Edwin Saavedra
{"title":"Estimation of soil moisture of a high Andean wetland ecosystem (Bofedal) with geo-radar data and In-Situ measurements, Ayacucho - Peru","authors":"Wilmer Moncada ,&nbsp;Alex Pereda ,&nbsp;Manuel Masías ,&nbsp;Manuel Lagos ,&nbsp;Edwin Portal-Quicaña ,&nbsp;Cristhian Aldana ,&nbsp;Yesenia Saavedra ,&nbsp;Edwin Saavedra","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High Andean ecosystems within microbasins serve as crucial areas for water recharge, containing both surface and subsurface moisture. However, these ecosystems are currently under threat due to overgrazing, degradation, and the impacts of climate change. The objective is to validate the subsoil moisture of bofedal estimated using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data in comparison to <em>in-situ</em> measurements obtained with a soil moisture meter (SMM) in the Apacheta microbasin of the Ayacucho region. The validation method involves comparing soil moisture values obtained with the SMM, with the estimated dielectric permittivity (DP) values from GPR surveys along four transects (T) in a bofedal. Reflected wave amplitude data are converted to DP values to identify water pockets (<span><math><mrow><mn>70</mn><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>D</mi><mi>P</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>81</mn></mrow></math></span>) and saturated soil moisture (<span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>D</mi><mi>P</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>40</mn></mrow></math></span>). An analysis of the determination coefficient R<sup>2</sup> and the Kappa index <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>κ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> was conducted between both groups of bofedal subsoil moisture data along the four surveyed transects at depths ranging from 0 to 24 cm that contain water and saturated moisture. T1 contains a volume of <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>,</mo><mn>16</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> (47.85 %), T2 has <span><math><mrow><mn>0.98</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> (46.6 %), T3 lacks water (40.8 %), and T4 holds <span><math><mrow><mn>0.63</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> (31.45 %). The correlation of DP data with SMM for T1 (<span><math><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0.801</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>, T2 (<span><math><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0.949</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>, T3 (<span><math><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0.837</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> y T4 (<span><math><mrow><mrow><msup><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0.842</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> implies that the SMM measurements significantly explain the estimated DP. Moreover, the kappa test demonstrated good agreement reliability between both observations made with GPR and SMM, with <span><math><mrow><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.763</mn><mo>;</mo><mspace></mspace><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><mn>95</mn><mo>%</mo><mspace></mspace><mi>C</mi><mi>I</mi><mo>:</mo><mn>0.471</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>1.055</mn></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>, indicating that the GPR method for measuring subsoil moisture is acceptable with an 87.5% confidence level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 122-133"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633924000480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High Andean ecosystems within microbasins serve as crucial areas for water recharge, containing both surface and subsurface moisture. However, these ecosystems are currently under threat due to overgrazing, degradation, and the impacts of climate change. The objective is to validate the subsoil moisture of bofedal estimated using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data in comparison to in-situ measurements obtained with a soil moisture meter (SMM) in the Apacheta microbasin of the Ayacucho region. The validation method involves comparing soil moisture values obtained with the SMM, with the estimated dielectric permittivity (DP) values from GPR surveys along four transects (T) in a bofedal. Reflected wave amplitude data are converted to DP values to identify water pockets (70<DP<81) and saturated soil moisture (10<DP<40). An analysis of the determination coefficient R2 and the Kappa index (κ) was conducted between both groups of bofedal subsoil moisture data along the four surveyed transects at depths ranging from 0 to 24 cm that contain water and saturated moisture. T1 contains a volume of 1,16m3 (47.85 %), T2 has 0.98m3 (46.6 %), T3 lacks water (40.8 %), and T4 holds 0.63m3 (31.45 %). The correlation of DP data with SMM for T1 (R2=0.801), T2 (R2=0.949), T3 (R2=0.837) y T4 (R2=0.842) implies that the SMM measurements significantly explain the estimated DP. Moreover, the kappa test demonstrated good agreement reliability between both observations made with GPR and SMM, with κ=0.763;[95%CI:0.4711.055], indicating that the GPR method for measuring subsoil moisture is acceptable with an 87.5% confidence level.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信