Concurrent validity of scores from phone-based caregiver reports on early childhood development: Evidence from the Early Childhood Development Index 2030 implementation in Nepal

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kenji Kitamura , Filipa De Castro , Perman Gochyyev , Dipu Shakya , Claudia Cappa , Shyam Prasad Acharya , Devi Ram Acharya , Nicole Petrowski
{"title":"Concurrent validity of scores from phone-based caregiver reports on early childhood development: Evidence from the Early Childhood Development Index 2030 implementation in Nepal","authors":"Kenji Kitamura ,&nbsp;Filipa De Castro ,&nbsp;Perman Gochyyev ,&nbsp;Dipu Shakya ,&nbsp;Claudia Cappa ,&nbsp;Shyam Prasad Acharya ,&nbsp;Devi Ram Acharya ,&nbsp;Nicole Petrowski","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI2030) is a caregiver-reported tool designed to monitor progress toward Sustainable Development Goal target 4.2, which aims to ensure universal access to quality early childhood development (ECD), care, and pre-primary education to prepare children for primary education and inform national policies. Using the ECDI2030 through phone-based administration for remote data collection is expected to contribute to efficient evidence generation. However, the existing evidence for caregiver-reported ECD measures are exclusively drawn from studies on assessments through face-to-face interviews. We conducted a validation trial in Nepal, comparing randomly divided in-person and telephone interviews groups. The results support the concurrent validity of phone-based ECDI2030 scores for measuring ECD at a group level while highlighting administrative challenges specific to the phone-based method. This study contributes to the literature on ECD measurement and provides insights into the practical implications of different modes of data collection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI2030) is a caregiver-reported tool designed to monitor progress toward Sustainable Development Goal target 4.2, which aims to ensure universal access to quality early childhood development (ECD), care, and pre-primary education to prepare children for primary education and inform national policies. Using the ECDI2030 through phone-based administration for remote data collection is expected to contribute to efficient evidence generation. However, the existing evidence for caregiver-reported ECD measures are exclusively drawn from studies on assessments through face-to-face interviews. We conducted a validation trial in Nepal, comparing randomly divided in-person and telephone interviews groups. The results support the concurrent validity of phone-based ECDI2030 scores for measuring ECD at a group level while highlighting administrative challenges specific to the phone-based method. This study contributes to the literature on ECD measurement and provides insights into the practical implications of different modes of data collection.
基于电话的儿童早期发展照护者报告得分的同时效度:来自尼泊尔儿童早期发展指数2030实施的证据
2030年儿童早期发展指数(ECDI2030)是一项由照顾者报告的工具,旨在监测可持续发展目标具体目标4.2的进展情况,该目标旨在确保普遍获得高质量的儿童早期发展、照料和学前教育,为儿童接受初等教育做好准备,并为国家政策提供信息。通过基于电话的管理使用ECDI2030进行远程数据收集,预计将有助于有效地生成证据。然而,现有的关于照顾者报告的幼儿发展措施的证据完全来自于通过面对面访谈进行评估的研究。我们在尼泊尔进行了一项验证试验,比较了随机划分的面对面访谈组和电话访谈组。研究结果支持基于手机的ECDI2030评分在群体层面衡量ECD的同时有效性,同时强调了基于手机的方法特有的管理挑战。本研究对ECD测量的文献有所贡献,并对不同数据收集模式的实际意义提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信