Investigating relationships among students’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback on EFL writing

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430

Haitao Chen , Guangwei Hu

{"title":"Investigating relationships among students’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback on EFL writing","authors":"Haitao Chen , Guangwei Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study adopted a mixed-methods design to examine how feedback givers’/receivers’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback were related to each other. One hundred and twenty-four English-major sophomores, purposively sampled based on their English proficiency and willingness to participate, responded to questionnaires administered at the beginning and the end of a 16-week writing course to gauge their engagement with peer feedback. Eight of them participated in stimulated recalls conducted to explore, in depth, the relationships among types of engagement with peer feedback. Analyses of the questionnaire data revealed significant positive and negative correlations of varying strength among different types of engagement for feedback givers and receivers. Analyses of the stimulated recalls yielded further evidence that feedback givers’/receivers’ behavioral, cognitive and affective engagement were interrelated in complex ways. These findings have pedagogical implications for the enhancement of students’ engagement with peer feedback in similar contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24001160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study adopted a mixed-methods design to examine how feedback givers’/receivers’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback were related to each other. One hundred and twenty-four English-major sophomores, purposively sampled based on their English proficiency and willingness to participate, responded to questionnaires administered at the beginning and the end of a 16-week writing course to gauge their engagement with peer feedback. Eight of them participated in stimulated recalls conducted to explore, in depth, the relationships among types of engagement with peer feedback. Analyses of the questionnaire data revealed significant positive and negative correlations of varying strength among different types of engagement for feedback givers and receivers. Analyses of the stimulated recalls yielded further evidence that feedback givers’/receivers’ behavioral, cognitive and affective engagement were interrelated in complex ways. These findings have pedagogical implications for the enhancement of students’ engagement with peer feedback in similar contexts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studies in Educational Evaluation Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.