Controversias en la revascularización y el estudio de viabilidad miocárdica en el síndrome coronario crónico

Q4 Medicine
Luis Carlos Maestre-Luque , Rafael González-Manzanares , Clara Fernández-Cordón , Felipe Díez-Delhoyo
{"title":"Controversias en la revascularización y el estudio de viabilidad miocárdica en el síndrome coronario crónico","authors":"Luis Carlos Maestre-Luque ,&nbsp;Rafael González-Manzanares ,&nbsp;Clara Fernández-Cordón ,&nbsp;Felipe Díez-Delhoyo","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The broad spectrum of patients with chronic coronary syndrome and the controversies in diagnosis and treatment pose a major challenge in clinical decision making. Concerning the diagnosis, the utility of myocardial viability study has been questioned by recent clinical trials. Regarding the therapeutic approach, in patients with simple coronary disease, percutaneous revascularization has proved its utility in anginal symptoms relieve, but the evidence regarding a prognostic benefit is contradictory. In complex coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has reported better results than percutaneous intervention. Besides, surgical revascularization has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events over medical treatment in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. In this review we critically analyse the current evidence on viability study and myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153224001110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The broad spectrum of patients with chronic coronary syndrome and the controversies in diagnosis and treatment pose a major challenge in clinical decision making. Concerning the diagnosis, the utility of myocardial viability study has been questioned by recent clinical trials. Regarding the therapeutic approach, in patients with simple coronary disease, percutaneous revascularization has proved its utility in anginal symptoms relieve, but the evidence regarding a prognostic benefit is contradictory. In complex coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has reported better results than percutaneous intervention. Besides, surgical revascularization has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events over medical treatment in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. In this review we critically analyse the current evidence on viability study and myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
关于慢性冠状动脉再血管化和心肌可行性研究的争议
慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的广谱性和在诊断和治疗上的争议给临床决策带来了重大挑战。在诊断方面,心肌活力研究的实用性受到近期临床试验的质疑。关于治疗方法,在单纯性冠状动脉疾病患者中,经皮血运重建术已证明其在缓解心绞痛症状方面的效用,但关于预后益处的证据是矛盾的。在复杂的冠状动脉疾病中,冠状动脉旁路移植术比经皮介入治疗效果更好。此外,在缺血性左心室功能障碍患者中,手术血运重建术比药物治疗更能减少心血管事件的发生。在这篇综述中,我们批判性地分析了慢性冠状动脉综合征患者活力研究和心肌血运重建术的现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信