{"title":"“I'm telling you”: The use of interactional metadiscourse in Chinese live streaming commerce","authors":"Qian Liu, Wei Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As an emerging form of mediated communication, live streaming commerce (LSC) has established itself as a distinctive business genre. This study examines the use of interactional metadiscourse by streamers in Chinese LSC. Using Hyland's interactional metadiscourse model, we analyzed a corpus of 60 LSC videos sourced from Alibaba's Taobao Live platform to identify patterns and functions of metadiscourse in fostering parasocial interaction. The findings reveal that streamers' promotional speech was rich in interactional metadiscourse. Among stance resources, self-mentions and boosters were used frequently, whereas hedges and attitude markers were less common. Engagement markers mainly included audience references, followed by questions and directives, with minimal use of personal asides and shared knowledge. These metadiscourse resources contribute to parasocial interaction. Stance resources enhance source credibility by presenting streamers as expert and trustworthy product endorsers. Engagement resources foster mutual awareness by cultivating a sense of co-presence between streamers and reviewers in personalized interactions, while also enhancing homophily by highlighting perceived similarities between the two. Collectively, these interactional metadiscourse strategies create an interactive online shopping discourse, fostering a heightened level of parasocial interaction, in which viewers are drawn into in an illusionary, reciprocal communication and form imagined friendships with streamers in the digital space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"237 ","pages":"Pages 14-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As an emerging form of mediated communication, live streaming commerce (LSC) has established itself as a distinctive business genre. This study examines the use of interactional metadiscourse by streamers in Chinese LSC. Using Hyland's interactional metadiscourse model, we analyzed a corpus of 60 LSC videos sourced from Alibaba's Taobao Live platform to identify patterns and functions of metadiscourse in fostering parasocial interaction. The findings reveal that streamers' promotional speech was rich in interactional metadiscourse. Among stance resources, self-mentions and boosters were used frequently, whereas hedges and attitude markers were less common. Engagement markers mainly included audience references, followed by questions and directives, with minimal use of personal asides and shared knowledge. These metadiscourse resources contribute to parasocial interaction. Stance resources enhance source credibility by presenting streamers as expert and trustworthy product endorsers. Engagement resources foster mutual awareness by cultivating a sense of co-presence between streamers and reviewers in personalized interactions, while also enhancing homophily by highlighting perceived similarities between the two. Collectively, these interactional metadiscourse strategies create an interactive online shopping discourse, fostering a heightened level of parasocial interaction, in which viewers are drawn into in an illusionary, reciprocal communication and form imagined friendships with streamers in the digital space.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.