Modeling the impacts of sand placement strategies on barrier island evolution in a semi-enclosed bay system

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Davina L. Passeri , Rangley C. Mickey , David M. Thompson , Michael Itzkin , Elizabeth Godsey , Matthew V. Bilskie , Alexander Seymour , Autumn Poisson , Jin Ikeda , Scott C. Hagen
{"title":"Modeling the impacts of sand placement strategies on barrier island evolution in a semi-enclosed bay system","authors":"Davina L. Passeri ,&nbsp;Rangley C. Mickey ,&nbsp;David M. Thompson ,&nbsp;Michael Itzkin ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Godsey ,&nbsp;Matthew V. Bilskie ,&nbsp;Alexander Seymour ,&nbsp;Autumn Poisson ,&nbsp;Jin Ikeda ,&nbsp;Scott C. Hagen","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the impacts of five proposed restoration actions at Little Dauphin Island, a low-lying relic spit in a semi-enclosed bay system on the Alabama coast. A Delft3D model is developed to simulate annual scale (five-year) sediment transport and resulting bed level changes. The model is validated with observed water level and wave data, as well as sediment tracers that were deployed offshore of the island. An XBeach model is developed to simulate storm-driven morphologic change and is validated for hurricanes Ivan (2004), Katrina (2005)and Sally (2020). Together, the models are used to assess differences in the island's morphological response under a no-action (status quo) scenario representing a continuous island, tidal inlet realignment, a sand motor nourishment, beach and dune restoration and a dredged offshore borrow area. The no-action scenario revealed that the island breached at multiple locations including the location of the proposed inlet realignment during each storm. The realigned channel did not prevent breaching on the island, but reduced the magnitude of sand transported through the breaches. The sand motor provided some sheltering to leeward shorelines during storms but did not prevent breaching from occurring elsewhere. Fairweather waves and currents were not strong enough to transport sand outside of the vicinity of the feature to feed adjacent shorelines as intended. The beach and dune restoration reduced storm-driven overtopping along the nourished shoreline. For habitat purposes, strategically placed bayous provided low elevation points that allowed overwash depending on the direction of cross-barrier water level gradients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 104697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838392500002X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the impacts of five proposed restoration actions at Little Dauphin Island, a low-lying relic spit in a semi-enclosed bay system on the Alabama coast. A Delft3D model is developed to simulate annual scale (five-year) sediment transport and resulting bed level changes. The model is validated with observed water level and wave data, as well as sediment tracers that were deployed offshore of the island. An XBeach model is developed to simulate storm-driven morphologic change and is validated for hurricanes Ivan (2004), Katrina (2005)and Sally (2020). Together, the models are used to assess differences in the island's morphological response under a no-action (status quo) scenario representing a continuous island, tidal inlet realignment, a sand motor nourishment, beach and dune restoration and a dredged offshore borrow area. The no-action scenario revealed that the island breached at multiple locations including the location of the proposed inlet realignment during each storm. The realigned channel did not prevent breaching on the island, but reduced the magnitude of sand transported through the breaches. The sand motor provided some sheltering to leeward shorelines during storms but did not prevent breaching from occurring elsewhere. Fairweather waves and currents were not strong enough to transport sand outside of the vicinity of the feature to feed adjacent shorelines as intended. The beach and dune restoration reduced storm-driven overtopping along the nourished shoreline. For habitat purposes, strategically placed bayous provided low elevation points that allowed overwash depending on the direction of cross-barrier water level gradients.
模拟半封闭海湾系统中沙放置策略对堰洲岛演化的影响
本研究评估了小海豚岛五项拟议修复行动的影响,小海豚岛是阿拉巴马州海岸半封闭海湾系统中的一个低洼遗址。开发了Delft3D模型来模拟年尺度(5年)泥沙运移和由此产生的河床水位变化。该模型用观测到的水位和波浪数据以及部署在岛屿近海的沉积物示踪剂进行了验证。开发了XBeach模型来模拟风暴驱动的形态变化,并对伊万(2004年)、卡特里娜(2005年)和莎莉(2020年)飓风进行了验证。总之,这些模型被用来评估在无行动(现状)情景下岛屿形态响应的差异,这些情景代表了连续的岛屿、潮汐入口重新调整、沙运动营养、海滩和沙丘恢复以及疏浚的近海借用区。在不采取行动的情况下,岛屿在多个位置被破坏,包括每次风暴期间拟议的入口重新调整的位置。重新排列的河道并没有阻止岛上的决口,但减少了通过决口运输的沙子的数量。在风暴期间,沙马达为下风海岸线提供了一些庇护,但并不能防止其他地方发生破裂。费尔韦瑟海浪和海流不够强大,无法像预期的那样将沙子输送到附近的海岸线。海滩和沙丘的恢复减少了风暴导致的沿滋养海岸线的溢水。出于栖息地的目的,策略性地设置的河口提供了低海拔点,根据跨屏障水位梯度的方向允许过度冲刷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信