Comparative toxicity mechanisms of sulfoxaflor and lambda-cyhalothrin against Apolygus lucorum from enzymatic and transcriptomic perspectives: Efficient application of insecticides

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Lu Xu , Baosheng Liu , Liubin Xiao , Zhichun Zhang , Hongtao Niu , Dongxiao Zhao , Shuai Sun , Huifang Guo
{"title":"Comparative toxicity mechanisms of sulfoxaflor and lambda-cyhalothrin against Apolygus lucorum from enzymatic and transcriptomic perspectives: Efficient application of insecticides","authors":"Lu Xu ,&nbsp;Baosheng Liu ,&nbsp;Liubin Xiao ,&nbsp;Zhichun Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongtao Niu ,&nbsp;Dongxiao Zhao ,&nbsp;Shuai Sun ,&nbsp;Huifang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin is threatened by insecticide resistance and has been registered to control <em>Apolygus lucorum</em>. The sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor as an excellent candidate is recommended for its management. Previous studies have mainly focused on identifying resistance genes and their sublethal effects on the biological characteristics of these two insecticides in this pest. However, the toxicity mechanism differences of lambda-cyhalothrin and sulfoxaflor exposures are largely unknown. The LD<sub>10</sub> and LD<sub>30</sub> values were measured with significant difference as 0.15, 0.46, 33.58, and 73.60 ng/insect for sulfoxaflor and lambda-cyhalothrin, respectively, indicating differences in the insecticide type. Exposure to sublethal sulfoxaflor resulted in a higher total number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (550 and 995 DEGs) than exposure to sublethal lambda-cyhalothrin (101 and 112 DEGs). Moreover, enrichment analysis showed that more metabolic and signaling pathways were involved in the toxicity of sulfoxaflor than that of lambda-cyhalothrin, and enzyme activities in the enriched pathways were induced by sulfoxaflor and inhibited by lambda-cyhalothrin. For transcriptome validation, DEGs encoding detoxification-related genes were identified and validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). These results indicate that sulfoxaflor is more toxic than lambda-cyhalothrin due to different modes of action. Our findings not only first provide insight into the toxicity mechanism differences of lambda-cyhalothrin and sulfoxaflor action and detoxification in <em>A. lucorum</em> at molecular and biochemical levels but also offer data and techniques for registering candidate sulfoxaflor and efficient application of insecticides in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 106306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357525000197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin is threatened by insecticide resistance and has been registered to control Apolygus lucorum. The sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor as an excellent candidate is recommended for its management. Previous studies have mainly focused on identifying resistance genes and their sublethal effects on the biological characteristics of these two insecticides in this pest. However, the toxicity mechanism differences of lambda-cyhalothrin and sulfoxaflor exposures are largely unknown. The LD10 and LD30 values were measured with significant difference as 0.15, 0.46, 33.58, and 73.60 ng/insect for sulfoxaflor and lambda-cyhalothrin, respectively, indicating differences in the insecticide type. Exposure to sublethal sulfoxaflor resulted in a higher total number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (550 and 995 DEGs) than exposure to sublethal lambda-cyhalothrin (101 and 112 DEGs). Moreover, enrichment analysis showed that more metabolic and signaling pathways were involved in the toxicity of sulfoxaflor than that of lambda-cyhalothrin, and enzyme activities in the enriched pathways were induced by sulfoxaflor and inhibited by lambda-cyhalothrin. For transcriptome validation, DEGs encoding detoxification-related genes were identified and validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). These results indicate that sulfoxaflor is more toxic than lambda-cyhalothrin due to different modes of action. Our findings not only first provide insight into the toxicity mechanism differences of lambda-cyhalothrin and sulfoxaflor action and detoxification in A. lucorum at molecular and biochemical levels but also offer data and techniques for registering candidate sulfoxaflor and efficient application of insecticides in the field.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance. Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of: • Comparative toxicity • Mode of action • Pathophysiology • Plant growth regulators • Resistance • Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信