Alterations in microbial community structures and metabolic function in soil treated with biological and chemical insecticides

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Renwen Zheng , Jun Peng , Qianqian Li , Yue Liu , Dongyan Huang , Yangjunlu Sheng , Cui Liu , Lei Qi , Nemat O. Keyhani , Qingfeng Tang
{"title":"Alterations in microbial community structures and metabolic function in soil treated with biological and chemical insecticides","authors":"Renwen Zheng ,&nbsp;Jun Peng ,&nbsp;Qianqian Li ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Dongyan Huang ,&nbsp;Yangjunlu Sheng ,&nbsp;Cui Liu ,&nbsp;Lei Qi ,&nbsp;Nemat O. Keyhani ,&nbsp;Qingfeng Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entomopathogenic fungi show significant promise as effective and ecological friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides for insect pest control. However, little is known concerning their effects on soil ecosystems, especially in comparison to application of chemical insecticides. Here, we examined the effects of one biological and two chemical insecticides, <em>Metarhizium anisopliae</em>, imidacloprid (IMI) and emamectin benzoate (EMB) on microbial community structure, metabolic functioning, and soil biochemistry. Treatment with EMB and IMI, reduced Actinobacteriota populations, while increasing that of Acidobacteriota. However, these populations were not significantly altered under <em>M. anisopliae</em> treatment. Chemical pesticides also altered fungal communities including potential pathogens. Activities of soil beneficial nitrogen-cycling-related enzymes were reduced after application of IMI and EMB, but were increased after treatment with <em>M. anisopliae</em>. Metagenomics analysis showed that IMI treatment reduced levels of carbon and nitrogen-related metabolic pathways. However, <em>M. anisopliae</em> treatment increased representation of key enzymes involved in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling important for maintenance of soil fertility. Insecticides treatments altered the abundance of a number antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) but not virulence factors (VFs), whereas application of <em>M. anisopliae</em> resulted had only minimal effects. These findings highlight the consequences of use of biological vs. chemical pesticides on soil microbiology can affect plant and ecosystem health indicating that the fungal biological control agent, <em>M. anisopliae</em> likely has far less detrimental and potentially beneficial effects on soil ecology as compared to chemical pesticides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 106304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357525000173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entomopathogenic fungi show significant promise as effective and ecological friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides for insect pest control. However, little is known concerning their effects on soil ecosystems, especially in comparison to application of chemical insecticides. Here, we examined the effects of one biological and two chemical insecticides, Metarhizium anisopliae, imidacloprid (IMI) and emamectin benzoate (EMB) on microbial community structure, metabolic functioning, and soil biochemistry. Treatment with EMB and IMI, reduced Actinobacteriota populations, while increasing that of Acidobacteriota. However, these populations were not significantly altered under M. anisopliae treatment. Chemical pesticides also altered fungal communities including potential pathogens. Activities of soil beneficial nitrogen-cycling-related enzymes were reduced after application of IMI and EMB, but were increased after treatment with M. anisopliae. Metagenomics analysis showed that IMI treatment reduced levels of carbon and nitrogen-related metabolic pathways. However, M. anisopliae treatment increased representation of key enzymes involved in the carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling important for maintenance of soil fertility. Insecticides treatments altered the abundance of a number antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) but not virulence factors (VFs), whereas application of M. anisopliae resulted had only minimal effects. These findings highlight the consequences of use of biological vs. chemical pesticides on soil microbiology can affect plant and ecosystem health indicating that the fungal biological control agent, M. anisopliae likely has far less detrimental and potentially beneficial effects on soil ecology as compared to chemical pesticides.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance. Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of: • Comparative toxicity • Mode of action • Pathophysiology • Plant growth regulators • Resistance • Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信