Anxiety and depression in colorectal Pelvic Floor Disorders among low Socioeconomic Status and ethnic groups

Aliki Rompou, Carlotta Sarzo, Abigail Fernandes, Fernando Safadi, Maxwell Renna, Alison Hainsworth, Linda Ferrari
{"title":"Anxiety and depression in colorectal Pelvic Floor Disorders among low Socioeconomic Status and ethnic groups","authors":"Aliki Rompou,&nbsp;Carlotta Sarzo,&nbsp;Abigail Fernandes,&nbsp;Fernando Safadi,&nbsp;Maxwell Renna,&nbsp;Alison Hainsworth,&nbsp;Linda Ferrari","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale:</h3><div>While anxiety and depression are noted in Pelvic Floor Disorders (PFD) patients, their influence on care and association with Socioeconomic Status (SES) and ethnicity are unstudied.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>To assess the impact of psychiatric conditions on PFD among ethnic minorities and different SES.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A retrospective study conducted at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK. Patient demographics, main complaints, symptoms, psychiatric disorders, and data related to the entire care process were collected.</div><div>To assess the patients’ SES, we used the Index of Multiple Deprivation scores and grouped them into quintiles, with the lowest quintile representing the most deprived. Statistical tests evaluated how the care process differed between patients with and without psychiatric disorders, anxiety, or depression.</div></div><div><h3>Findings:</h3><div>Out of 2001 patients, 399 had at least one psychiatric disorder. These patients had higher rates of fecal​ incontinence (p = 0.02) and missed follow-up appointments more often (p = 0.005). No significant differences in clinical variables were found between patients with and without anxiety. Patients with depression had higher rates of anal incontinence (p = 0.005) and higher rates of referrals from the Telephone Assessment Triage Clinic to tests, diagnostic tests, and discussions in multidisciplinary meetings (p = 0.03, p = 0.04, p = 0.04). Furthermore, they were less likely to complete the care cycle (p = 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>This study highlights the impact of depression on patient care, underscoring the need to prioritize mental health for optimal treatment. No significant associations were found between psychiatric disorders and SES or ethnicity. Larger future studies are needed to explore potential correlations and develop targeted emotional support strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 101734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724010099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale:

While anxiety and depression are noted in Pelvic Floor Disorders (PFD) patients, their influence on care and association with Socioeconomic Status (SES) and ethnicity are unstudied.

Objective:

To assess the impact of psychiatric conditions on PFD among ethnic minorities and different SES.

Methods:

A retrospective study conducted at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK. Patient demographics, main complaints, symptoms, psychiatric disorders, and data related to the entire care process were collected.
To assess the patients’ SES, we used the Index of Multiple Deprivation scores and grouped them into quintiles, with the lowest quintile representing the most deprived. Statistical tests evaluated how the care process differed between patients with and without psychiatric disorders, anxiety, or depression.

Findings:

Out of 2001 patients, 399 had at least one psychiatric disorder. These patients had higher rates of fecal​ incontinence (p = 0.02) and missed follow-up appointments more often (p = 0.005). No significant differences in clinical variables were found between patients with and without anxiety. Patients with depression had higher rates of anal incontinence (p = 0.005) and higher rates of referrals from the Telephone Assessment Triage Clinic to tests, diagnostic tests, and discussions in multidisciplinary meetings (p = 0.03, p = 0.04, p = 0.04). Furthermore, they were less likely to complete the care cycle (p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

This study highlights the impact of depression on patient care, underscoring the need to prioritize mental health for optimal treatment. No significant associations were found between psychiatric disorders and SES or ethnicity. Larger future studies are needed to explore potential correlations and develop targeted emotional support strategies.
低社会经济地位和种族群体中结直肠盆底疾病的焦虑和抑郁
理由:虽然焦虑和抑郁在盆底疾病(PFD)患者中被注意到,但它们对护理的影响以及与社会经济地位(SES)和种族的关系尚未研究。目的:探讨少数民族和不同社会经济地位人群精神状况对ptsd的影响。方法:回顾性研究进行了盖伊和圣托马斯医院,伦敦,英国。收集患者人口统计资料、主要主诉、症状、精神障碍以及与整个护理过程相关的数据。为了评估患者的社会经济状况,我们使用多重剥夺指数得分并将其分为五分位数,最低的五分位数代表最被剥夺的五分位数。统计测试评估了有精神障碍、焦虑或抑郁的患者和没有精神障碍的患者之间护理过程的差异。研究结果:在2001例患者中,399例至少患有一种精神疾病。这些患者有更高的大便失禁率(p = 0.02)和更频繁的错过随访预约(p = 0.005)。有无焦虑的患者在临床变量上无显著差异。抑郁症患者肛门失禁的发生率较高(p = 0.005),从电话评估分类诊所转介到测试、诊断测试和多学科会议讨论的比率较高(p = 0.03, p = 0.04, p = 0.04)。此外,他们完成护理周期的可能性更小(p = 0.02)。结论:本研究强调了抑郁症对患者护理的影响,强调了优先考虑心理健康以获得最佳治疗的必要性。没有发现精神疾病与社会经济地位或种族之间的显著关联。未来需要更大规模的研究来探索潜在的相关性,并制定有针对性的情感支持策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信