Novel explicit models for assessing the frictional resistance of pipe piles subjected to seismic effects

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Duaa Al-Jeznawi , Laith Sadik , Saif Alzabeebee , Musab Aied Qissab Al-Janabi , Suraparb Keawsawasvong
{"title":"Novel explicit models for assessing the frictional resistance of pipe piles subjected to seismic effects","authors":"Duaa Al-Jeznawi ,&nbsp;Laith Sadik ,&nbsp;Saif Alzabeebee ,&nbsp;Musab Aied Qissab Al-Janabi ,&nbsp;Suraparb Keawsawasvong","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces novel explicit models to predict the frictional resistance of open and closed-ended pipe piles subjected to seismic loading. This research employs genetic programming (GP) and multiobjective genetic algorithm-based evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) to develop closed-form expressions for estimating pile frictional resistance, utilizing widely used input parameters for enhanced practicality and applicability in engineering practice. The proposed models are developed using only three input variables: the corrected standard penetration test (SPT) blow count (<em>N</em><sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub>, the pile slenderness ratio (<em>L</em>/<em>D</em>), and the peak ground acceleration (PGA). This deliberate reduction in input complexity significantly enhances the models' applicability across a wide range of geotechnical scenarios and industries. The accuracy of the developed models was assessed via the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). In the case of the GP model, the evaluation metrics for the testing set for open-ended piles (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE values) are 0.89, 0.43, and 0.35, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for closed-ended piles are 0.93, 0.38, and 0.3, respectively. On the other hand, the EPR-MOGA approach achieves similarly encouraging results, with performance metrics of 0.92, 0.37, and 0.29 for open-ended piles and 0.91, 0.39, and 0.30 for closed-ended piles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces novel explicit models to predict the frictional resistance of open and closed-ended pipe piles subjected to seismic loading. This research employs genetic programming (GP) and multiobjective genetic algorithm-based evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) to develop closed-form expressions for estimating pile frictional resistance, utilizing widely used input parameters for enhanced practicality and applicability in engineering practice. The proposed models are developed using only three input variables: the corrected standard penetration test (SPT) blow count (N1)60, the pile slenderness ratio (L/D), and the peak ground acceleration (PGA). This deliberate reduction in input complexity significantly enhances the models' applicability across a wide range of geotechnical scenarios and industries. The accuracy of the developed models was assessed via the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). In the case of the GP model, the evaluation metrics for the testing set for open-ended piles (R2, RMSE, and MAE values) are 0.89, 0.43, and 0.35, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for closed-ended piles are 0.93, 0.38, and 0.3, respectively. On the other hand, the EPR-MOGA approach achieves similarly encouraging results, with performance metrics of 0.92, 0.37, and 0.29 for open-ended piles and 0.91, 0.39, and 0.30 for closed-ended piles.
评估地震作用下管桩摩阻力的新显式模型
本文引入了新的显式模型来预测地震荷载作用下开端和闭端管桩的摩阻力。本研究采用遗传规划(GP)和基于多目标遗传算法的进化多项式回归(EPR-MOGA),利用广泛使用的输入参数,建立了估算桩侧摩阻力的封闭表达式,以增强工程实践中的实用性和应用性。所提出的模型仅使用三个输入变量:修正的标准贯入试验(SPT)吹风计数(N1)60,桩长细比(L/D)和峰值地面加速度(PGA)。这种刻意降低输入复杂性的做法显著提高了模型在岩土工程场景和行业中的适用性。通过决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)来评估所建立模型的准确性。在GP模型中,开放式桩测试集的评价指标(R2、RMSE和MAE值)分别为0.89、0.43和0.35,封闭式桩测试集的评价指标分别为0.93、0.38和0.3。另一方面,EPR-MOGA方法取得了同样令人鼓舞的结果,开放式桩的性能指标为0.92、0.37和0.29,封闭式桩的性能指标为0.91、0.39和0.30。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信