Novel explicit models for assessing the frictional resistance of pipe piles subjected to seismic effects

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Duaa Al-Jeznawi , Laith Sadik , Saif Alzabeebee , Musab Aied Qissab Al-Janabi , Suraparb Keawsawasvong
{"title":"Novel explicit models for assessing the frictional resistance of pipe piles subjected to seismic effects","authors":"Duaa Al-Jeznawi ,&nbsp;Laith Sadik ,&nbsp;Saif Alzabeebee ,&nbsp;Musab Aied Qissab Al-Janabi ,&nbsp;Suraparb Keawsawasvong","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces novel explicit models to predict the frictional resistance of open and closed-ended pipe piles subjected to seismic loading. This research employs genetic programming (GP) and multiobjective genetic algorithm-based evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) to develop closed-form expressions for estimating pile frictional resistance, utilizing widely used input parameters for enhanced practicality and applicability in engineering practice. The proposed models are developed using only three input variables: the corrected standard penetration test (SPT) blow count (<em>N</em><sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub>, the pile slenderness ratio (<em>L</em>/<em>D</em>), and the peak ground acceleration (PGA). This deliberate reduction in input complexity significantly enhances the models' applicability across a wide range of geotechnical scenarios and industries. The accuracy of the developed models was assessed via the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). In the case of the GP model, the evaluation metrics for the testing set for open-ended piles (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE values) are 0.89, 0.43, and 0.35, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for closed-ended piles are 0.93, 0.38, and 0.3, respectively. On the other hand, the EPR-MOGA approach achieves similarly encouraging results, with performance metrics of 0.92, 0.37, and 0.29 for open-ended piles and 0.91, 0.39, and 0.30 for closed-ended piles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces novel explicit models to predict the frictional resistance of open and closed-ended pipe piles subjected to seismic loading. This research employs genetic programming (GP) and multiobjective genetic algorithm-based evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) to develop closed-form expressions for estimating pile frictional resistance, utilizing widely used input parameters for enhanced practicality and applicability in engineering practice. The proposed models are developed using only three input variables: the corrected standard penetration test (SPT) blow count (N1)60, the pile slenderness ratio (L/D), and the peak ground acceleration (PGA). This deliberate reduction in input complexity significantly enhances the models' applicability across a wide range of geotechnical scenarios and industries. The accuracy of the developed models was assessed via the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). In the case of the GP model, the evaluation metrics for the testing set for open-ended piles (R2, RMSE, and MAE values) are 0.89, 0.43, and 0.35, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for closed-ended piles are 0.93, 0.38, and 0.3, respectively. On the other hand, the EPR-MOGA approach achieves similarly encouraging results, with performance metrics of 0.92, 0.37, and 0.29 for open-ended piles and 0.91, 0.39, and 0.30 for closed-ended piles.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信