{"title":"Is speed-watching a good idea? Potential metacognitive complications of watching instructional videos at faster speeds","authors":"Jode Keehr, Richard Reardon","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online learning has become mainstream for many learners. To save time, many students “speed-watch” video lectures (play them at faster-than-original speed). Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of video speed on learning, concentrating on aspects such as comprehension and satisfaction. Yet few researchers have considered metacognitive impacts of speed watching, especially within the context of a complex learning environment. In this study, we investigated the relationships between video playback speed, interruptions, and learning performance. Learning was assessed using measures of recognition, elaboration, and confidence. We presented participants with lectures at 1x and 1.5x speeds, with or without interruption. Results revealed that speed-watching did not impair recognition performance, nor did it hinder elaboration. Interruptions hampered elaboration, regardless of video speed, leading to acceptable memory for content, but weaker connection of the newer material to other relevant memory content. Additionally, speed-watching resulted in less confidence in learning, <em>except</em> when interruptions were present. We discuss potential speed-watching effects on attention and metacognition, i.e., that attention was increased, albeit at the expense of confidence. We encourage students to consider their learning environment when choosing to speed-watch. Less confident learners may adjust strategies in ways that defeat the time advantage gained by faster playback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108556"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Online learning has become mainstream for many learners. To save time, many students “speed-watch” video lectures (play them at faster-than-original speed). Numerous studies have evaluated the effect of video speed on learning, concentrating on aspects such as comprehension and satisfaction. Yet few researchers have considered metacognitive impacts of speed watching, especially within the context of a complex learning environment. In this study, we investigated the relationships between video playback speed, interruptions, and learning performance. Learning was assessed using measures of recognition, elaboration, and confidence. We presented participants with lectures at 1x and 1.5x speeds, with or without interruption. Results revealed that speed-watching did not impair recognition performance, nor did it hinder elaboration. Interruptions hampered elaboration, regardless of video speed, leading to acceptable memory for content, but weaker connection of the newer material to other relevant memory content. Additionally, speed-watching resulted in less confidence in learning, except when interruptions were present. We discuss potential speed-watching effects on attention and metacognition, i.e., that attention was increased, albeit at the expense of confidence. We encourage students to consider their learning environment when choosing to speed-watch. Less confident learners may adjust strategies in ways that defeat the time advantage gained by faster playback.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.