Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: A social network analysis

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julia Vassey , Ho-Chun Herbert Chang , Tom Valente , Jennifer B. Unger
{"title":"Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: A social network analysis","authors":"Julia Vassey ,&nbsp;Ho-Chun Herbert Chang ,&nbsp;Tom Valente ,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Unger","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021–2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and more active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times as high density, 281 times as high transitivity, and 86 times as high reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108545"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021–2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and more active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times as high density, 281 times as high transitivity, and 86 times as high reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信