Large-scale analysis of online social data on the long-term sentiment and content dynamics of online (mis)information

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julian Kauk , Edda Humprecht , Helene Kreysa , Stefan R. Schweinberger
{"title":"Large-scale analysis of online social data on the long-term sentiment and content dynamics of online (mis)information","authors":"Julian Kauk ,&nbsp;Edda Humprecht ,&nbsp;Helene Kreysa ,&nbsp;Stefan R. Schweinberger","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread dissemination of online misinformation poses a significant threat to both our information ecosystem and the decision-making processes of individuals and societies. While prior research has extensively examined the static characteristics of misinformation, its long-term evolution remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a dataset from Twitter (now “X”) comprising approximately two million tweets related to 366 fact-checked stories. Consistent with existing research, misinformation carried more negative emotions, particularly disgust and anger, compared to true information, while positive emotions were notably suppressed. Importantly, over time, misinformation became increasingly negative, a trend that was not observed for true information. Furthermore, we found a decreasing trend in positive emotions for misinformation, which was not mirrored in true information. These temporal sentiment dynamics were not attributable to differing content dynamics, as there was no evidence that the dominant narratives of false and true stories evolved differently. These findings underscore the importance of studying the temporal dynamics of online (mis)information; however, as our data was limited to fact-checked stories, it may not fully represent all information shared online. Nevertheless, these findings can (i) aid the efforts of politicians, journalists, social media providers, and the public in fostering a resilient information ecosystem, and (ii) inspire further research into areas such as the influence of source credibility, cross-platform generalizability, and underlying psychological mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108546"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322400414X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread dissemination of online misinformation poses a significant threat to both our information ecosystem and the decision-making processes of individuals and societies. While prior research has extensively examined the static characteristics of misinformation, its long-term evolution remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a dataset from Twitter (now “X”) comprising approximately two million tweets related to 366 fact-checked stories. Consistent with existing research, misinformation carried more negative emotions, particularly disgust and anger, compared to true information, while positive emotions were notably suppressed. Importantly, over time, misinformation became increasingly negative, a trend that was not observed for true information. Furthermore, we found a decreasing trend in positive emotions for misinformation, which was not mirrored in true information. These temporal sentiment dynamics were not attributable to differing content dynamics, as there was no evidence that the dominant narratives of false and true stories evolved differently. These findings underscore the importance of studying the temporal dynamics of online (mis)information; however, as our data was limited to fact-checked stories, it may not fully represent all information shared online. Nevertheless, these findings can (i) aid the efforts of politicians, journalists, social media providers, and the public in fostering a resilient information ecosystem, and (ii) inspire further research into areas such as the influence of source credibility, cross-platform generalizability, and underlying psychological mechanisms.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信