Use patterns of classic, novel, and herbal opioids

Elisabeth Prevete , Natasha L. Mason , Kim P. C. Kuypers , Eef L. Theunissen , Pablo Mallaroni , Massimo Pasquini , Johannes G. Ramaekers
{"title":"Use patterns of classic, novel, and herbal opioids","authors":"Elisabeth Prevete ,&nbsp;Natasha L. Mason ,&nbsp;Kim P. C. Kuypers ,&nbsp;Eef L. Theunissen ,&nbsp;Pablo Mallaroni ,&nbsp;Massimo Pasquini ,&nbsp;Johannes G. Ramaekers","doi":"10.1016/j.etdah.2024.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Data on use patterns and psychological and physical effects of novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) and herbal opioids like kratom <em>(Mitragyna speciosa)</em> lags behind that of classic opioids.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study aimed to describe use patterns, adverse events, subjective experience and motivation of use with classic, novel and herbal opioids.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A two-part survey was used. The first part examined the prevalence, use patterns (dosage, administration route, duration of effects), and associated adverse events of classic, novel and herbal opioids. The second part delved into detailed retrospective experiences of survey responders with an opioid of preferred choice, mostly kratom.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between May 2020 and February 2023, 467 respondents started the survey, of which 310 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 52 % (<em>N</em> = 161) completed the first part, 65.6 % (<em>N</em> = 105) started the second part of which 72 completed. Most respondents were male, highly educated, based in North America or Europe, often using multiple opioids. A total of twenty-seven different compounds were reported, of which hydrocodone/dihydrocodeine, kratom, acetylfentanyl, and U-47700 were used the most. A wide range of doses was reported for each compound. Median effect durations ranged between 3 and 4 h for most of the compounds. Administration routes varied, with oral intake being most prevalent. Fentanyl analogues were often administered intravenously. Physical/psychological adverse events were frequently reported by users of oxycodone, kratom, acetylfentanyl, and U-47700. User reports revealed that both kratom and classic opioids were used for recreational and medical purposes, including ameliorating pain, addiction/withdrawal, anxiety, and mood enhancement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Psychological and physical adverse events were widely present among classic, novel and herbal opioids suggesting a need for risk monitoring worldwide. Similarities between classic opioids and kratom include medical utility as well as addictive potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72899,"journal":{"name":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118224000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Data on use patterns and psychological and physical effects of novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) and herbal opioids like kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) lags behind that of classic opioids.

Aims

This study aimed to describe use patterns, adverse events, subjective experience and motivation of use with classic, novel and herbal opioids.

Methods

A two-part survey was used. The first part examined the prevalence, use patterns (dosage, administration route, duration of effects), and associated adverse events of classic, novel and herbal opioids. The second part delved into detailed retrospective experiences of survey responders with an opioid of preferred choice, mostly kratom.

Results

Between May 2020 and February 2023, 467 respondents started the survey, of which 310 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 52 % (N = 161) completed the first part, 65.6 % (N = 105) started the second part of which 72 completed. Most respondents were male, highly educated, based in North America or Europe, often using multiple opioids. A total of twenty-seven different compounds were reported, of which hydrocodone/dihydrocodeine, kratom, acetylfentanyl, and U-47700 were used the most. A wide range of doses was reported for each compound. Median effect durations ranged between 3 and 4 h for most of the compounds. Administration routes varied, with oral intake being most prevalent. Fentanyl analogues were often administered intravenously. Physical/psychological adverse events were frequently reported by users of oxycodone, kratom, acetylfentanyl, and U-47700. User reports revealed that both kratom and classic opioids were used for recreational and medical purposes, including ameliorating pain, addiction/withdrawal, anxiety, and mood enhancement.

Conclusion

Psychological and physical adverse events were widely present among classic, novel and herbal opioids suggesting a need for risk monitoring worldwide. Similarities between classic opioids and kratom include medical utility as well as addictive potential.
使用经典、新型和草药类阿片的模式
关于新型合成阿片类药物(nso)和草药阿片类药物如克拉托姆(Mitragyna speciosa)的使用模式和心理和生理效应的数据滞后于经典阿片类药物。目的本研究旨在描述经典阿片类药物、新型阿片类药物和草药阿片类药物的使用模式、不良事件、主观体验和使用动机。方法采用两部分调查法。第一部分研究了经典、新型和草药阿片类药物的患病率、使用模式(剂量、给药途径、作用持续时间)和相关不良事件。第二部分深入研究了具有首选阿片类药物(主要是克拉托姆)的调查应答者的详细回顾性经验。结果在2020年5月至2023年2月期间,共有467名受访者开始调查,其中310人符合纳入标准。其中52% (N = 161)完成了第一部分,65.6% (N = 105)开始了第二部分,其中72人完成了第二部分。大多数受访者是男性,受过高等教育,居住在北美或欧洲,经常使用多种阿片类药物。共报道了27种不同的化合物,其中使用最多的是氢可酮/二氢可待因、克拉通、乙酰芬太尼和U-47700。每种化合物的剂量范围都很广。大多数化合物的中位效应持续时间在3到4小时之间。给药途径多种多样,以口服给药最为普遍。芬太尼类似物通常是静脉注射。羟考酮、克拉通、乙酰芬太尼和U-47700使用者经常报告身体/心理不良事件。使用者报告显示,kratom和经典阿片类药物均用于娱乐和医疗目的,包括减轻疼痛、成瘾/戒断、焦虑和改善情绪。结论经典阿片类药物、新型阿片类药物和中草药阿片类药物的心理和生理不良事件普遍存在,需要在全球范围内开展风险监测。经典阿片类药物和克拉托姆之间的相似之处包括医疗效用和成瘾性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Forensic Medicine, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信