Production, investment and financial plan for a "natural gas+" integrated energy enterprise: An assessment using system dynamics and multi-objective optimization model

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Ye Xiong , Yifan Wang , Yue Zhang , Jieke Chen , Mengxi Wu
{"title":"Production, investment and financial plan for a \"natural gas+\" integrated energy enterprise: An assessment using system dynamics and multi-objective optimization model","authors":"Ye Xiong ,&nbsp;Yifan Wang ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Jieke Chen ,&nbsp;Mengxi Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the critical challenge of balancing energy supply, investment efficiency, and profitability during the transition of natural gas enterprises into “natural gas+ ” integrated energy systems. In a dynamic and uncertain environment, these systems face competing objectives: the carbon neutrality, resource optimization, and financial sustainability. To address these complexities, this study proposes a System Dynamics-Multi-Objective Programming (SD-MOP) model, grounded in the “Business-Production-Investment-Financial-Target” (BPIFT) framework, to integrate production, investment, and financial planning. The model incorporates SD to capture dynamic feedback among production, investment, and financial processes; MOP to resolve conflicting goals; Monte Carlo simulations to assess uncertainties across 200 scenarios; and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to generate Pareto-optimal solutions. Results identify key variables, such as the Reserve Replacement Ratio (RRR) and Single Well Production (SWP), as critical for maintaining system stability. Scenario analyses demonstrate that the model balances competing objectives, achieving a 14 % improvement in energy supply and a 19 % increase in profitability, while highlighting the trade-offs between maximizing energy supply and profitability under manageable investment levels. Overall, these findings establish the model as a practical decision-making tool for integrated energy enterprises, aligning enterprise strategies with sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 1859-1874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484725000447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the critical challenge of balancing energy supply, investment efficiency, and profitability during the transition of natural gas enterprises into “natural gas+ ” integrated energy systems. In a dynamic and uncertain environment, these systems face competing objectives: the carbon neutrality, resource optimization, and financial sustainability. To address these complexities, this study proposes a System Dynamics-Multi-Objective Programming (SD-MOP) model, grounded in the “Business-Production-Investment-Financial-Target” (BPIFT) framework, to integrate production, investment, and financial planning. The model incorporates SD to capture dynamic feedback among production, investment, and financial processes; MOP to resolve conflicting goals; Monte Carlo simulations to assess uncertainties across 200 scenarios; and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to generate Pareto-optimal solutions. Results identify key variables, such as the Reserve Replacement Ratio (RRR) and Single Well Production (SWP), as critical for maintaining system stability. Scenario analyses demonstrate that the model balances competing objectives, achieving a 14 % improvement in energy supply and a 19 % increase in profitability, while highlighting the trade-offs between maximizing energy supply and profitability under manageable investment levels. Overall, these findings establish the model as a practical decision-making tool for integrated energy enterprises, aligning enterprise strategies with sustainability goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信