How did credit guarantee fund supports affect the bank-loan network in Türkiye?

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ayça Topalog̃lu-Bozkurt , Süheyla Özyıldırım
{"title":"How did credit guarantee fund supports affect the bank-loan network in Türkiye?","authors":"Ayça Topalog̃lu-Bozkurt ,&nbsp;Süheyla Özyıldırım","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2024.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using granular data from the Turkish banking system, we investigate the effect of credit guarantee schemes (CGSs) in 2017 and early 2018 on bank connectedness originating from common borrower firms. Our empirical findings show that the CGSs affect the connectedness of banks differently. While CGSs significantly increases the connectedness of large and small banks, they do not have a significant effect on medium-sized banks. In addition, the connectedness of state-owned banks and private domestic banks are significantly increased with the CGSs. Moreover, the CGSs increase the centrality of the strongly connected banks, while they do not have a significant effect on the centrality of the moderately or weakly connected banks. Finally, we find that the negative relation between the connectedness of the banks and the bank loan portfolio riskiness strengthens with the CGSs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070124000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using granular data from the Turkish banking system, we investigate the effect of credit guarantee schemes (CGSs) in 2017 and early 2018 on bank connectedness originating from common borrower firms. Our empirical findings show that the CGSs affect the connectedness of banks differently. While CGSs significantly increases the connectedness of large and small banks, they do not have a significant effect on medium-sized banks. In addition, the connectedness of state-owned banks and private domestic banks are significantly increased with the CGSs. Moreover, the CGSs increase the centrality of the strongly connected banks, while they do not have a significant effect on the centrality of the moderately or weakly connected banks. Finally, we find that the negative relation between the connectedness of the banks and the bank loan portfolio riskiness strengthens with the CGSs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信