Prevent or treat occupational noise exposure in artisanal fishers? Decision-making based on public expenditure

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
José Bakit , Enzo Bonilla , Sebastian Villasante , Niris Cortés , Begoña Peceño
{"title":"Prevent or treat occupational noise exposure in artisanal fishers? Decision-making based on public expenditure","authors":"José Bakit ,&nbsp;Enzo Bonilla ,&nbsp;Sebastian Villasante ,&nbsp;Niris Cortés ,&nbsp;Begoña Peceño","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-scale fisheries account for 40 % of the world's capture fisheries and employ approximately 90 % of the people in the fishing sector. The effects of noise exposure on occupational health have been studied extensively. Studies have been conducted in fisheries in various parts of the world showing hazardous noise levels in different fishing vessels; however, these studies were conducted in industrial fisheries, leaving artisanal fisheries with knowledge gaps. This work focused on artisanal fishers is the first to (a) determine their perception of noise exposure, (b) quantitatively assess their exposure to noise in small vessels, and (c) determine the economic benefits of implementing preventive measures versus the treatment scenario of noise-induced hearing loss in this target group. The results indicate that most of them work at risk of noise exposure and are unaware of it. All tasks and scenarios analysed exceed the maximum permissible noise exposure limits, mainly caused by boat engines. The economic analysis showed that the benefits (savings) of the preventive measures outweighed the expenses (costs) of medical treatment for potential artisanal fishers with hearing loss. The investment spent on preventive measures recovered after 8.65 years. Other benefits correspond to the decongestion of the public healthcare network and reduction in public expenditure. Finally, our study provides quantitative information that fills gaps in the information available to decision-makers when defining public policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries account for 40 % of the world's capture fisheries and employ approximately 90 % of the people in the fishing sector. The effects of noise exposure on occupational health have been studied extensively. Studies have been conducted in fisheries in various parts of the world showing hazardous noise levels in different fishing vessels; however, these studies were conducted in industrial fisheries, leaving artisanal fisheries with knowledge gaps. This work focused on artisanal fishers is the first to (a) determine their perception of noise exposure, (b) quantitatively assess their exposure to noise in small vessels, and (c) determine the economic benefits of implementing preventive measures versus the treatment scenario of noise-induced hearing loss in this target group. The results indicate that most of them work at risk of noise exposure and are unaware of it. All tasks and scenarios analysed exceed the maximum permissible noise exposure limits, mainly caused by boat engines. The economic analysis showed that the benefits (savings) of the preventive measures outweighed the expenses (costs) of medical treatment for potential artisanal fishers with hearing loss. The investment spent on preventive measures recovered after 8.65 years. Other benefits correspond to the decongestion of the public healthcare network and reduction in public expenditure. Finally, our study provides quantitative information that fills gaps in the information available to decision-makers when defining public policies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信