Productivity changes and management systems in small-scale fisheries

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jose Alberto de Santiago , Sebastián Villasante , Ana Tubío , Manel Antelo , Pablo Pita , Jose María Da Rocha
{"title":"Productivity changes and management systems in small-scale fisheries","authors":"Jose Alberto de Santiago ,&nbsp;Sebastián Villasante ,&nbsp;Ana Tubío ,&nbsp;Manel Antelo ,&nbsp;Pablo Pita ,&nbsp;Jose María Da Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While productivity is an important measure of economic performance by commercial fisheries, the productivity of small-scale fisheries has largely been unexplored. To address this research gap, we quantify the productivity and performance of shellfish production for on-foot shellfishing and shellfish farms in Galicia (NW Spain) – as two similar economic activities subjected to different fishery management regimes. Thus, while shellfish farms are privately managed, on-foot shellfishing is managed on the basis of a common or shared resource. The paper analyses production, prices, and income for four shellfish species – common cockle (<em>Cerastoderma edule</em>), grooved carpet shell (<em>Ruditapes decussatus</em>), Japanese clam (<em>Ruditapes philippinarum</em>), and pullet carpet shell (<em>Venerupis corrugata</em>) – for 2011–2020 in an area where both forms of production co-exist. This research shows that, since mollusc species are homogeneous from the point of view of buyers, regardless of the production system, any possible differences in productivity between the two activities cannot be explained through prices. Rather, three-quarters of the productivity difference is due to the intensity of capital investment, proxied by the cultivated seed cost, which is different for on-foot shellfishing and shellfish farms. Endogenous dynamics in the behaviour of shellfish farms lead them to be more efficient than on-foot shellfishers in exploiting shellfish resources, due to incentives that do not exist for on-foot shellfishing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While productivity is an important measure of economic performance by commercial fisheries, the productivity of small-scale fisheries has largely been unexplored. To address this research gap, we quantify the productivity and performance of shellfish production for on-foot shellfishing and shellfish farms in Galicia (NW Spain) – as two similar economic activities subjected to different fishery management regimes. Thus, while shellfish farms are privately managed, on-foot shellfishing is managed on the basis of a common or shared resource. The paper analyses production, prices, and income for four shellfish species – common cockle (Cerastoderma edule), grooved carpet shell (Ruditapes decussatus), Japanese clam (Ruditapes philippinarum), and pullet carpet shell (Venerupis corrugata) – for 2011–2020 in an area where both forms of production co-exist. This research shows that, since mollusc species are homogeneous from the point of view of buyers, regardless of the production system, any possible differences in productivity between the two activities cannot be explained through prices. Rather, three-quarters of the productivity difference is due to the intensity of capital investment, proxied by the cultivated seed cost, which is different for on-foot shellfishing and shellfish farms. Endogenous dynamics in the behaviour of shellfish farms lead them to be more efficient than on-foot shellfishers in exploiting shellfish resources, due to incentives that do not exist for on-foot shellfishing.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信