Optimizing window solar heat gain coefficient for energy and carbon performance in a changing context of electrification and decarbonization

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Holly Samuelson , Charu Srivastava , Amir Baniassadi
{"title":"Optimizing window solar heat gain coefficient for energy and carbon performance in a changing context of electrification and decarbonization","authors":"Holly Samuelson ,&nbsp;Charu Srivastava ,&nbsp;Amir Baniassadi","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional building energy code requirements and design best-practices encourage limitations on the passive solar heat gain that can be admitted by window glass. This requirement exists even in cold climates, residential buildings, and equator-facing windows, where winter solar heat gain may be especially beneficial. This study hypothesizes that such solar heat gain limitations may not always lead to optimal operational energy and carbon performance, especially when considering new trends, including solar electricity generation and space heating with air-source heat pumps, which need to work harder at the extreme winter temperatures experienced in cold climates. To investigate, we simulated 13 window solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) permutations in prototypical south-facing apartments with heat pumps in 19 US cities from mixed to very cold ASHRAE climate zones to compare energy performance, carbon emissions, and peak electricity loads. We calculated the optimal SHGC of the windows and compared these values to the limit set by prescriptive building energy codes. In colder ASHRAE climate zone cases, a higher SHGC than allowable by prescriptive codes improved performance for every metric tested. Optimizing SHGC for annual heating, cooling, and lighting electricity use in the six coldest and cloudiest cities, resulted in savings of 1–6 % annual electricity use, 3–11 % peak-hour heating, cooling, and lighting electricity use, and 6–19 % long-run marginal carbon emissions. These findings suggest that window SHGC limitations, and perhaps other design decisions that include a compromise between heating and cooling performance, may warrant further investigation in this changing context of building electrification and grid decarbonization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 1450-1466"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484725000125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional building energy code requirements and design best-practices encourage limitations on the passive solar heat gain that can be admitted by window glass. This requirement exists even in cold climates, residential buildings, and equator-facing windows, where winter solar heat gain may be especially beneficial. This study hypothesizes that such solar heat gain limitations may not always lead to optimal operational energy and carbon performance, especially when considering new trends, including solar electricity generation and space heating with air-source heat pumps, which need to work harder at the extreme winter temperatures experienced in cold climates. To investigate, we simulated 13 window solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) permutations in prototypical south-facing apartments with heat pumps in 19 US cities from mixed to very cold ASHRAE climate zones to compare energy performance, carbon emissions, and peak electricity loads. We calculated the optimal SHGC of the windows and compared these values to the limit set by prescriptive building energy codes. In colder ASHRAE climate zone cases, a higher SHGC than allowable by prescriptive codes improved performance for every metric tested. Optimizing SHGC for annual heating, cooling, and lighting electricity use in the six coldest and cloudiest cities, resulted in savings of 1–6 % annual electricity use, 3–11 % peak-hour heating, cooling, and lighting electricity use, and 6–19 % long-run marginal carbon emissions. These findings suggest that window SHGC limitations, and perhaps other design decisions that include a compromise between heating and cooling performance, may warrant further investigation in this changing context of building electrification and grid decarbonization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信