Monte Carlo simulation-based economic risk assessment in energy communities

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Klara Maggauer, Bernadette Fina
{"title":"Monte Carlo simulation-based economic risk assessment in energy communities","authors":"Klara Maggauer,&nbsp;Bernadette Fina","doi":"10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy communities (ECs) offer significant potential for enhancing citizens’ energy self-sufficiency. However, for their broad diffusion, ensuring economic viability is vital. This necessitates prudent financial decisions, featuring comprehensive profitability assessments and uncertainty-awareness before investing. Our study introduces a method for EC financing decisions under uncertainties that may result in economic risks, which is an aspect that has not yet been explored in existing literature. Using a Monte Carlo simulation-based approach, we evaluate two financing options – direct investment and contracting – for establishing photovoltaics-based ECs at two social housing sites in Austria, where sound financial decisions are especially relevant. Our approach considers the joint impact of technological, environmental, and economic uncertainties on profitability. Findings reveal that contracting is more profitable and risk-averse than direct investment if the contractor’s profit margin remains below 5.3%. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls of a naive, expectation value-based approach, demonstrating the risk of profit overestimation. This manifests in a likelihood of 68% that the naively calculated net present value (NPV) differs from the real NPV by up to 196%. Moreover, we show that while a basic sensitivity analysis can indicate the risk of financial loss, it cannot convey the likelihood of such loss, unlike our MCS-based approach. We thus illustrate the importance of considering uncertainties when deciding on EC financing because purely deterministic approaches likely result in disadvantageous financial decisions, potentially deterring from EC participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11798,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 987-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472400862X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy communities (ECs) offer significant potential for enhancing citizens’ energy self-sufficiency. However, for their broad diffusion, ensuring economic viability is vital. This necessitates prudent financial decisions, featuring comprehensive profitability assessments and uncertainty-awareness before investing. Our study introduces a method for EC financing decisions under uncertainties that may result in economic risks, which is an aspect that has not yet been explored in existing literature. Using a Monte Carlo simulation-based approach, we evaluate two financing options – direct investment and contracting – for establishing photovoltaics-based ECs at two social housing sites in Austria, where sound financial decisions are especially relevant. Our approach considers the joint impact of technological, environmental, and economic uncertainties on profitability. Findings reveal that contracting is more profitable and risk-averse than direct investment if the contractor’s profit margin remains below 5.3%. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls of a naive, expectation value-based approach, demonstrating the risk of profit overestimation. This manifests in a likelihood of 68% that the naively calculated net present value (NPV) differs from the real NPV by up to 196%. Moreover, we show that while a basic sensitivity analysis can indicate the risk of financial loss, it cannot convey the likelihood of such loss, unlike our MCS-based approach. We thus illustrate the importance of considering uncertainties when deciding on EC financing because purely deterministic approaches likely result in disadvantageous financial decisions, potentially deterring from EC participation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Reports
Energy Reports Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Energy Reports is a new online multidisciplinary open access journal which focuses on publishing new research in the area of Energy with a rapid review and publication time. Energy Reports will be open to direct submissions and also to submissions from other Elsevier Energy journals, whose Editors have determined that Energy Reports would be a better fit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信