Articular cartilage debridement results in short-term significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes for large areas of cartilage loss of the femur in the setting of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis

Yusuf Mufti, Jared P. Sachs, Andrew S. Bi, Chloe Franzia, John Ebersole, Taylor Giordano, Brian J. Cole
{"title":"Articular cartilage debridement results in short-term significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes for large areas of cartilage loss of the femur in the setting of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Yusuf Mufti,&nbsp;Jared P. Sachs,&nbsp;Andrew S. Bi,&nbsp;Chloe Franzia,&nbsp;John Ebersole,&nbsp;Taylor Giordano,&nbsp;Brian J. Cole","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chondroplasty is a surgical option for chondral defects, but its effect on larger cartilage defects in the setting of knee osteoarthritis remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following chondroplasty in patients with larger chondral defects (≥2 cm<sup>2</sup>) of the femur in the setting of osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of patients who underwent chondroplasty of the femur. All patients had Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades of 2 or 3 and a minimum of 1-year postoperative follow-up. Chondral loss was estimated by arthroscopic measurements and by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). PROs included the International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and the Veterans Rand-12 Item. Statistical analysis was performed using paired <em>t</em> tests to compare baseline and follow-up data, as well as linear regressions to correlate lesion size with symptom improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>39 patients with 20 KL grade 2 and 19 KL grade 3 knees were included. At both 1- and 2-year follow-ups, significant improvements were noted in International Knee Documentation Committee (34.9 ± 13.5 preoperative, 55.6 ± 18.8 at 2 years, <em>P</em> = .0025), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (56.3 ± 14.7 preoperative, 64.5 ± 17.0 at 2 years, <em>P</em> = .0243), and Veterans Rand-12 Item Physical Component Scores (38.0 ± 12.7 preoperative, 43.8 ± 8.6 at 2 years, <em>P</em> = .0044). Four (10.3%) conversions to arthroplasty were noted at most recent follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Articular cartilage debridement for large areas of cartilage loss of the femur in the setting of mild to moderate osteoarthritis results in significant improvements in physical function and knee-specific PROs at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266725452400057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Chondroplasty is a surgical option for chondral defects, but its effect on larger cartilage defects in the setting of knee osteoarthritis remains unclear.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following chondroplasty in patients with larger chondral defects (≥2 cm2) of the femur in the setting of osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods

Retrospective review of patients who underwent chondroplasty of the femur. All patients had Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades of 2 or 3 and a minimum of 1-year postoperative follow-up. Chondral loss was estimated by arthroscopic measurements and by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). PROs included the International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and the Veterans Rand-12 Item. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t tests to compare baseline and follow-up data, as well as linear regressions to correlate lesion size with symptom improvement.

Results

39 patients with 20 KL grade 2 and 19 KL grade 3 knees were included. At both 1- and 2-year follow-ups, significant improvements were noted in International Knee Documentation Committee (34.9 ± 13.5 preoperative, 55.6 ± 18.8 at 2 years, P = .0025), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (56.3 ± 14.7 preoperative, 64.5 ± 17.0 at 2 years, P = .0243), and Veterans Rand-12 Item Physical Component Scores (38.0 ± 12.7 preoperative, 43.8 ± 8.6 at 2 years, P = .0044). Four (10.3%) conversions to arthroplasty were noted at most recent follow-up.

Conclusions

Articular cartilage debridement for large areas of cartilage loss of the femur in the setting of mild to moderate osteoarthritis results in significant improvements in physical function and knee-specific PROs at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.
对于轻度至中度膝骨性关节炎的股骨大面积软骨丢失患者,关节软骨清创可在短期内显著改善患者报告的预后
软骨成形术是治疗软骨缺损的一种手术选择,但其对膝关节骨性关节炎中较大软骨缺损的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估骨性关节炎患者股骨较大软骨缺损(≥2 cm2)软骨成形术后患者报告的预后(PROs)。材料和方法回顾性分析行股骨软骨成形术的患者。所有患者的Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)评分为2或3级,术后随访至少1年。通过关节镜测量和磁共振成像(MRI)估计软骨损失。PROs包括国际膝关节文献委员会,膝关节损伤和骨关节炎关节置换术结局评分,以及退伍军人Rand-12项目。采用配对t检验进行统计分析,比较基线和随访数据,并采用线性回归分析病变大小与症状改善的相关性。结果39例KL 2级20例,3级19例。在1年和2年的随访中,国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee)(术前34.9±13.5,2年时55.6±18.8,P = 0.0025)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎关节置换术结局评分(术前56.3±14.7,2年时64.5±17.0,P = 0.0243)和Veterans -12项目身体成分评分(术前38.0±12.7,2年时43.8±8.6,P = 0.0044)均有显著改善。在最近的随访中,有4例(10.3%)转为关节置换术。结论关节软骨清创治疗轻至中度骨关节炎患者的股骨大面积软骨缺损,在1年和2年的随访中可显著改善患者的身体功能和膝关节特异性pro。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信