Carbon and energy utilization in microbial cell extracts from soil

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Milan Varsadiya , Fatemeh Dehghani , Shiyue Yang , Evgenia Blagodatskaya , Thomas Maskow , Dimitri V. Meier , Tillmann Lueders
{"title":"Carbon and energy utilization in microbial cell extracts from soil","authors":"Milan Varsadiya ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Dehghani ,&nbsp;Shiyue Yang ,&nbsp;Evgenia Blagodatskaya ,&nbsp;Thomas Maskow ,&nbsp;Dimitri V. Meier ,&nbsp;Tillmann Lueders","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2025.103713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE), the ratio of carbon retained in biomass vs. total C uptake, is central to our understanding of organic C turnover in soil. A precise quantification of CUE in soils can be challenging, given the considerable analytical uncertainties of organic and inorganic C backgrounds. At the same time, CUE measured for model pure cultures will be distinct from a diverse microbiota in soil. As a proxy between laboratory cultures and complex soil microbiomes, we tested soil-free microbial cell extracts (SFCE) to unravel patterns of C utilization in soil-derived microbiomes of reduced complexity. For this, we have revisited and optimized established protocols to extract microbial cells from agricultural soil via Nycodenz density centrifugation. The total extracted cells were quantified, accounting for up to ∼3.5 × 10<sup>7</sup> cells g<sup>−1</sup> soil and representing ∼12.5 % of the original soil microbiome. The diversity of microbes in SFCE, while consistently reduced compared to soil, still retained a surprisingly high proportion of the original soil microbiome, with ASVs recovered from 21 phyla. We then inferred CUE from calorespirometric measurements (metabolic heat flow and CO<sub>2</sub> production) to compare values between SFCE and intact soil. Both were amended with substrates (glucose, glutamine, and glycerol) of different C and N content, and C oxidation state (NOSC). SFCE showed CUE values principally comparable to that of the intact soil, but with substrate-specific distinctions. Amplicon sequencing and qPCR-based quantification showed typical soil taxa like <em>Pseudomonas</em>, <em>Pseudarthrobacter</em>, and <em>Bacteroidota</em> to respond to substrate addition in soil and SFCE. Our results support the use of SFCE as a valuable and complementary approach toward elucidating microbial CUE and growth patterns for complex soil microbiota.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 103713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556325000056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE), the ratio of carbon retained in biomass vs. total C uptake, is central to our understanding of organic C turnover in soil. A precise quantification of CUE in soils can be challenging, given the considerable analytical uncertainties of organic and inorganic C backgrounds. At the same time, CUE measured for model pure cultures will be distinct from a diverse microbiota in soil. As a proxy between laboratory cultures and complex soil microbiomes, we tested soil-free microbial cell extracts (SFCE) to unravel patterns of C utilization in soil-derived microbiomes of reduced complexity. For this, we have revisited and optimized established protocols to extract microbial cells from agricultural soil via Nycodenz density centrifugation. The total extracted cells were quantified, accounting for up to ∼3.5 × 107 cells g−1 soil and representing ∼12.5 % of the original soil microbiome. The diversity of microbes in SFCE, while consistently reduced compared to soil, still retained a surprisingly high proportion of the original soil microbiome, with ASVs recovered from 21 phyla. We then inferred CUE from calorespirometric measurements (metabolic heat flow and CO2 production) to compare values between SFCE and intact soil. Both were amended with substrates (glucose, glutamine, and glycerol) of different C and N content, and C oxidation state (NOSC). SFCE showed CUE values principally comparable to that of the intact soil, but with substrate-specific distinctions. Amplicon sequencing and qPCR-based quantification showed typical soil taxa like Pseudomonas, Pseudarthrobacter, and Bacteroidota to respond to substrate addition in soil and SFCE. Our results support the use of SFCE as a valuable and complementary approach toward elucidating microbial CUE and growth patterns for complex soil microbiota.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信