{"title":"Reliability assessment of steel slag and construction waste backfill for reinforced earth structures using response surface method","authors":"Sanjana Sarkar , Amarnath Hegde","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study investigates the potential of two waste materials, steel slag and construction and demolition waste (CDW) as backfills for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The design of MSE walls traditionally relies on factors of safety (FS) derived from empirical assessments, leading to uncertainties in soil behaviour and stability evaluations. To address this, probabilistic analyses were conducted to evaluate the suitability of slag and CDW backfills. The performance of MSE walls with various backfills was compared through FLAC-2D finite difference simulations. The findings show that substituting sand with slag or CDW significantly reduced the horizontal facing displacement by 83 % and 86 %, respectively. Lower reinforcement strains were also observed with slag and CDW backfills compared to sand. Further, probabilistic studies were conducted on the numerical model using the response surface method (RSM). The reliability index of the MSE wall model was determined using RSM considering uncertainties in soil properties and reinforcement characteristics. At a specified displacement limit, the probability of failure of walls filled with slag and CDW was significantly lower than that of walls filled with sand. Partial safety factors pertaining to friction angle, unit weight and geogrid stiffness were higher with slag and CDW backfills, suggesting reduced risk of failure associated with the alternate backfills. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of using slag and CDW in MSE walls, highlighting the improved performance of these alternate backfills over conventional backfill.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 1","pages":"Article 101569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study investigates the potential of two waste materials, steel slag and construction and demolition waste (CDW) as backfills for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The design of MSE walls traditionally relies on factors of safety (FS) derived from empirical assessments, leading to uncertainties in soil behaviour and stability evaluations. To address this, probabilistic analyses were conducted to evaluate the suitability of slag and CDW backfills. The performance of MSE walls with various backfills was compared through FLAC-2D finite difference simulations. The findings show that substituting sand with slag or CDW significantly reduced the horizontal facing displacement by 83 % and 86 %, respectively. Lower reinforcement strains were also observed with slag and CDW backfills compared to sand. Further, probabilistic studies were conducted on the numerical model using the response surface method (RSM). The reliability index of the MSE wall model was determined using RSM considering uncertainties in soil properties and reinforcement characteristics. At a specified displacement limit, the probability of failure of walls filled with slag and CDW was significantly lower than that of walls filled with sand. Partial safety factors pertaining to friction angle, unit weight and geogrid stiffness were higher with slag and CDW backfills, suggesting reduced risk of failure associated with the alternate backfills. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of using slag and CDW in MSE walls, highlighting the improved performance of these alternate backfills over conventional backfill.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.