Reliability assessment of steel slag and construction waste backfill for reinforced earth structures using response surface method

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Sanjana Sarkar , Amarnath Hegde
{"title":"Reliability assessment of steel slag and construction waste backfill for reinforced earth structures using response surface method","authors":"Sanjana Sarkar ,&nbsp;Amarnath Hegde","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study investigates the potential of two waste materials, steel slag and construction and demolition waste (CDW) as backfills for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The design of MSE walls traditionally relies on factors of safety (FS) derived from empirical assessments, leading to uncertainties in soil behaviour and stability evaluations. To address this, probabilistic analyses were conducted to evaluate the suitability of slag and CDW backfills. The performance of MSE walls with various backfills was compared through FLAC-2D finite difference simulations. The findings show that substituting sand with slag or CDW significantly reduced the horizontal facing displacement by 83 % and 86 %, respectively. Lower reinforcement strains were also observed with slag and CDW backfills compared to sand. Further, probabilistic studies were conducted on the numerical model using the response surface method (RSM). The reliability index of the MSE wall model was determined using RSM considering uncertainties in soil properties and reinforcement characteristics. At a specified displacement limit, the probability of failure of walls filled with slag and CDW was significantly lower than that of walls filled with sand. Partial safety factors pertaining to friction angle, unit weight and geogrid stiffness were higher with slag and CDW backfills, suggesting reduced risk of failure associated with the alternate backfills. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of using slag and CDW in MSE walls, highlighting the improved performance of these alternate backfills over conventional backfill.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 1","pages":"Article 101569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates the potential of two waste materials, steel slag and construction and demolition waste (CDW) as backfills for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The design of MSE walls traditionally relies on factors of safety (FS) derived from empirical assessments, leading to uncertainties in soil behaviour and stability evaluations. To address this, probabilistic analyses were conducted to evaluate the suitability of slag and CDW backfills. The performance of MSE walls with various backfills was compared through FLAC-2D finite difference simulations. The findings show that substituting sand with slag or CDW significantly reduced the horizontal facing displacement by 83 % and 86 %, respectively. Lower reinforcement strains were also observed with slag and CDW backfills compared to sand. Further, probabilistic studies were conducted on the numerical model using the response surface method (RSM). The reliability index of the MSE wall model was determined using RSM considering uncertainties in soil properties and reinforcement characteristics. At a specified displacement limit, the probability of failure of walls filled with slag and CDW was significantly lower than that of walls filled with sand. Partial safety factors pertaining to friction angle, unit weight and geogrid stiffness were higher with slag and CDW backfills, suggesting reduced risk of failure associated with the alternate backfills. These findings emphasize the potential benefits of using slag and CDW in MSE walls, highlighting the improved performance of these alternate backfills over conventional backfill.
用响应面法评价钢渣和建筑垃圾回填加筋土结构的可靠度
研究了钢渣和建筑垃圾作为机械稳定土(MSE)墙体回填材料的潜力。MSE墙的设计传统上依赖于经验评估得出的安全系数(FS),导致土壤行为和稳定性评估的不确定性。为了解决这一问题,进行了概率分析,以评估矿渣和CDW充填体的适用性。通过FLAC-2D有限差分模拟,比较了不同充填方式下MSE墙体的性能。研究结果表明,用矿渣或CDW替代砂可显著降低水平面驱替,分别降低83%和86%。与砂相比,矿渣和CDW充填体的钢筋应变也较低。利用响应面法(RSM)对数值模型进行了概率研究。考虑土体性质和加筋特性的不确定性,采用RSM法确定了MSE墙体模型的可靠度指标。在一定的位移极限下,填充矿渣和CDW的墙体破坏概率明显低于填充砂的墙体。与摩擦角、单位重量和土工格栅刚度相关的部分安全系数在矿渣和CDW充填体中较高,表明替代充填体降低了破坏风险。这些发现强调了在MSE壁中使用矿渣和CDW的潜在好处,突出了这些替代充填体比传统充填体性能的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信